Purely to protect the dirty old pervs? FFS, sack her.

old men sexually molesting 13 y/o girls.... that's not a big deal? WTF is wrong with this woman?

This woman makes Sarah Palin seem sane.

Bleedin' heck, at first I thought you said fingering.

Anywho, 13 would be ridiculous.

Its is in America and UK.

Ah yeah, lets change the laws so that these dirty old men get away with it. Then when the futures dirty old men go even younger, lets change the age of consent again to 8 or so. And so on until theres no age of consent. All to protect the perverts. Great idea.

13 year olds having sex? That's bloody disgusting, needs to sort herself out

As long as the old rich men are happy who the **** are we to complain? How dare we interupt their twilight years with complaints about their fiddling of children sooooo long ago.

WTF is wrong with that woman? It's one thing to have those type of opinions, it's another thing to actually feel comfortable expressing those opinions in public. What a pitiful, delusional, and dangerous HAG she is.

keep making apologies you old bitch, because we should be protecting the old perverted rich men, not the young vulnerable girls. What a stupid ****ing woman.

She is an idiot

Couldn't agree more....

Let's keep in mind that not only were a lot of these women that were assaulted much younger and also from working class backrounds, but also these men that are being prosecuted actually went to Homes and Hospitals designed for girls that already had mental health issues, under the guise of "charity". So these girls were already MORE vulnerable than most other girls. Also girls and woman who were new to the industry and looked up to these men as mentors.

So it's not even just the age of the girls they preyed upon, they specifically targeted girls that were vulnerable in many other ways. It was literally like shooting fish in a barrel for these men. ****ing cowards.

I agree with this, a lot of adults are quite annoying when it comes to this subject as eventually the children are gonna be adults and they will need some education on how to actually sustain the Human race.

And 13 is to young as I was even more immature 4 years ago than I am now, and I think it's sick of that woman to defend a man who raped a 9 year old.

we arn't talking about kids having sex with each other , we are talking about adults having sex with kids. especially adults who are celebrities and have wealth and fame and influence on kids, and forcing themselves by various means of influence onto those children.

This has nothing to do with children's natural sexuality. There is nothing natural about an adult man propositioning a 13 y/o girl.

A far as i'm concerned 13 y/o's shouldn't even be trusted to make their own choices about what to eat for dinner (look at the childhood obesity epidemic in the UK) let alone be trusted to make their own sexual decisions with an older man.

Very well put.

No way, parents shouldn't force children to have dinner that they don't want, as after all what if the child didn't like the food they was given? Also it would be hypocritical of any parent to do that as they wouldn't have liked it if their parents done it to them when they was a kid.

And if the child wants to hurt their health by not eating enough Fruit and Veg then it's up to them imo.

Ok Mock will hold you to that in a few years time when you have your own kids, and you have cooked a dinner for EVERYONE and one of your little darlings stamps their feet and demands McDonalds.

you don't think it might be a valuable lesson to teach your 13 y/o children that you don't just eat what you like, you eat what is best for you, mockinator?

When i'm a parent, as long as i'm buying the food, that means I, and only I, have the decision in what's going on the dinner table. Zero discussion.

Does that mean my kids will never get to have treats like pizza and fast food on special occassions? no. BUt i promise you my kids won't be fat when they turn 18. After they turn 18 they can get as fat as they want. And i will love them no matter what they look like. But as long as i'm buying the food, i'm responsible for their health. I would consider myself a failure as a parent if my children were fat when they were under my care.

There is a certain level of "forcing" that must be done as a parent though.

Obviously if they genuinely don't like a certain food then they shouldn't eat it. But, like most kids, if they had the option to eat sweets, chocolate and ice cream rather than a healthy meal then they would.

So a certain level of making the child eat proper food must be done.
Obviously, a line is drawn at physically forcing the child to eat. But it's your job as a parent to teach and guide them in the right way.

For a minute there I thought it was Joeysteele posted this ^ lol I was so shocked, I breathed a sigh of relief when i realized it wasn't Joey :laugh:

But Mock seriously??? Parents have an obligation to teach their kids to eat properly and be healthy and not become obese or have high blood pressure. One of the roles of being a parent is to teach them and also to protect them, making them eat healthily is both of these things. I do hope you realize that before you have kids yourself.

I often have to cook for my family and it pisses me off when they object to something :laugh: not just a parenthood problem

Yeah, well it's bloody ungrateful tbh