This poll is just for yourself so why have you made it public? You arent listening to anyone and your choices are ludicrous to say the least. I fail to see why you bothered with this.

Your point is valid if we are talking longevity BUT if you actually think that prime for prime Jordan was MORE DOMINANT then Shaq you are showing yourself up TBH.

Who was more dominant than Wilt? You should rename this to 'GOAT sportsmen that Legend Killer has heard of.'

Also, you talk about dominant - although something tells me you just made that up on the spot. So was Ronnie O'sullivan seriously more dominant than Stephen Hendry? When was that cuz I remember other wise.

Don't deflect so your telling me Prime for Prime (note I am not talking longevity) Jordan was more dominant then Shaq??

6 Rings is all I need to point out. Was Shaq more dominant than Wilt? Never. Not even in your twisted recollection of events.

To put the Ronnie vs Hendry argument into simple context

PAST HIS PRIME Ronnie is playing at a level that would match or even better prime Hendry every other game

Go look at Hendry's head to head against Ronnie and Higgins?? Steven is a very good player but his WEAK ERA made him look that much better and his head to head vs Ronnie and John proves this I am afraid

Nastia Liuken

Fisher better then Lebron

Girth ladies and gents

You talk about dominant. You bought that word into it not me. No one was winning events easier than Hendry. Ronnie always struggled with his temperament even in his prime.

If we are to use the word dominant then Stephen Hendry has been the most dominant snooker player that has ever lived.

Fisher got lucky on a few good team are you saying Jordan got lucky. 6 rings six finals mvp's. Who else has done that? Did Shaq do that ?

No MJ....

I'm out.

Oh and as Girth said...if you are going to pick Shaq then you have to go for Wilt or Bill Russell instead tbh.

I would say coming back and winning the WC in an era where pundits rave about it being the strongest EVER without playing a match in a year is as easy as it comes

Like I said most of Stevens success can be attributed to have Ken and Jimmy bottle job white as your main comp

And Ronnie. Lets not forget him.

LOOOOL Wilt played in an era where 95% of centres were half his bloody size for all his success in regular season it did not translate to much when it really mattered in the finals

What THE 18 YEAR OLD RONNIE who embarrassed Hendry at the UK???

Shaq's 3-peat:

2000 Finals 38.0 ppg, 16.7 rpg, 2.3 apg, 2.67 bpg, 61.1 FG%
2001 Finals 33.0 ppg, 15.8 rpg, 4.8 apg, 3.40 bpg, 57.3 FG%
2002 Finals 36.3 ppg, 12.3 rpg, 3.8 apg, 2.75 bpg, 59.5 FG%

We will never see such dominance in the NBA again

One of MJ,Wilt,Kareem,Magic,Bird or Russell should rep Basketball tbh. Depends if you prefere big men or Perimeter guys.

/Thread

Oh waaw, more ridiculousness from LK! Shaq is not even the best center, let alone the best BB player. The whole universe knows thats MJ!
Mayweather? LMAO! He's been ducking the only decent fighter in this pitiful end of an era of boxing!

Once again you prove how much of a joke you are about everything, ever!!!

kimi raikkonen

http://i.imgur.com/xK8RE85.gif

This is what makes you so dumb. Putting down athletes like chamberlain, or Russell. You just look like a fool. And it makes any good point you might make become moot.

I am surprised he didnt put Dwayne Wade! :laugh:

Yesterday cricket, today basketball, wonder what sport LK will get educated in tomorrow

Take your pic! :)

What a clueless statement. No son it does not depend any GM with half a brain would build there team around a great big man rather then a great perimeter player

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/uploads/cho...dard_352.0.jpg

Yes I bet he was nearly as scared as Manny is of needles PMSL!!!!!!!!!!!!!