ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB7 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   Double Eviction Twist and New/Old Housemates! (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22690)

Red Moon 03-08-2006 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nik_fatw
Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
Please chuck a R in. In currently reads "Hash"
?Que?
I miss spelt harsh - I put hash. The spell checker didn't pick it up because it was a real word!

Pain of being a someone with dyslexia and a spell checker,

nik_fatw 03-08-2006 11:27 PM

I don't want another moose in the hoose - no not again - please!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RAS 03-08-2006 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
Please chuck a R in. In currently reads "Hash"
For information I'm a Dyslexic - but consider it done!
I wasn't trying to be rude. I just noticed it, and it was annoying me Just pointed it out because it was the main reason of your post:thumbs:

Red Moon 03-08-2006 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
I wasn't trying to be rude. I just noticed it, and it was annoying me Just pointed it out because it was the main reason of your post:thumbs:
That's okay but a U2U would have done and I would have corrected it.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Foebane100 03-08-2006 11:29 PM

I'm a bit annoyed the twists should not be for the public not when the public are spending their money to evict people. I think this is almost a fraudulent act by the BB producers. People could have spent extra money trying to save or evict Mikey or Suzie for example and now wouldn’t have knowing that both are likely to go now. It is different not telling the housemates there will be a double eviction compared with the public.

RAS 03-08-2006 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
I wasn't trying to be rude. I just noticed it, and it was annoying me Just pointed it out because it was the main reason of your post:thumbs:
That's okay but a U2U would have done and I would have corrected it.

Thanks for pointing it out.
I wouldn't even know how to send a U2U to be honest, haven't sent one before, but i shall look into it now.

Sorry if i offended you with my original post.

Mike 03-08-2006 11:32 PM

If this is true then it would have to be Jonathon, he deserves a chance to prove himself especially as alot of people were saying he was boring yet he was only on our TV screens for a few days.

Red Moon 03-08-2006 11:33 PM

I agree Foebane100 they should have been up front at the start. Now people will vote again for the second housemate they want out, hence making even money from the show.

On putting someone in the house the only person they can put in, we know of, is Jonathan he is the only one the public didn't vote out.

Smeggypants 03-08-2006 11:34 PM

Jonathon seemed boring to me.

nik_fatw 03-08-2006 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Foebane100
I'm a bit annoyed the twists should not be for the public not when the public are spending their money to evict people. I think this is almost a fraudulent act by the BB producers. People could have spent extra money trying to save or evict Mikey or Suzie for example and now wouldn’t have knowing that both are likely to go now. It is different not telling the housemates there will be a double eviction compared with the public.
You have a very good point but when have BB ever played by the rules?

While I understand your concern if they do do what we are talking about it will sure as hell liven up what has become a fairly dull house!

Also it will lessen the chances of my Favorite to win or come second (Richard) but I would rather sacrifice that for a more lively show.

RAS 03-08-2006 11:35 PM

JonathAn seemed like a tidy guy to me.

nik_fatw 03-08-2006 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
JonathAn seemed like a tidy guy to me.
I'd like to see more from Johnathon, he had a really bad deal

Red Moon 03-08-2006 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
Sorry if i offended you with my original post.
No problem, you aren't the first and won't be the last person.

If anything it's my fault I need to get this macintosh computer to read back the posts for me again before I hit the send button. I didn't set it up when I reinstalled the software just before the show started.

Foebane100 03-08-2006 11:39 PM

Anyone except Jonathon or an unknown who goes back in cannot win as they were evicted.

RAS 03-08-2006 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nik_fatw
Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
JonathAn seemed like a tidy guy to me.
I'd like to see more from Johnathon, he had a really bad deal
Yep, i did feel sorry for JonathAn, considering how well the other housemates from the secret house did in the real house, we were probaly quite unlcuky that he was the one housemate who got evicted.

Red Moon 03-08-2006 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Smeggypants
Jonathon seemed boring to me.
I thought Jonathan had potential. I always was felt that Ash had made the wrong choice when she was left with the final two to chose from. Jonathan might have not been a really big character but I thought he had something to say for himself and would have done well in the show.

nik_fatw 03-08-2006 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:

Originally posted by RAS
Sorry if i offended you with my original post.
No problem, you aren't the first and won't be the last person.

If anything it's my fault I need to get this macintosh computer to read back the posts for me again before I hit the send button. I didn't set it up when I reinstalled the software just before the show started.
It's a shame the forum software does not have a built in Spellchecker like some others do. I'm a bit dyslectic myself and it would really help!


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.