It's fair if the viewers decide it, lol.

Nothing about the game is fair per se. Considering that, sure, it's no more or less fair.

A. They shouldn't have pre-chosen the pairs. This is obviously a ploy to get Dexter and Charlie or Daley and Hazel alone in a bedroom.
B. The two chosen housemates should not be allowed to leave the safe house. Again, thus the only thing that changes from living in the regular house (from the viewer's perspective) is that the two chosen housemates get to be alone at night. Again, Dexter and Charlie or Daley and Hazel ploy. If Dan and Gina (or most anyone else) are voted into the safe house, they will just go in to get treats and then spend the rest of the time back in the regular house before going to sleep at night. What's the point?

I really don't like it when Channel 5 'fixes' the dynamics of the house.

Yes it is fair, because it is the VIEWERS making them safe.

What isn't fair is what happened in CBB in January, where BB chose to move Speidi into a secret house and BB made Speidi safe.

Saying no is quite like saying its unfair to have vote to save and the same person being save every week :laugh:

The only unfair thing about this is the pre-picking of the pairs (which has happened both weeks)

Jesus. What Im saying is they shouldn't even be allowed to be voted for. Take gina and dexter out of it. And just do a dan and Charlie. They shouldn't be given the chance imo again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk_gL...1ZVvfpyJIloNrw

hahahahaha just love gina's reaction to the news, it's an absolute classic, she really thought that big brother thought highly of her to keep her in hahahahaha she even starts shaking at some point.

i don't think it's fair to allow them back in, but they have split them up in the pairings, seriously let them pair em up like that, it's ment to be entertaining thats the whole point and it will be. about time channel 5 got some balls and made it entertaining.

I don't think they should be given the option tbh, even though I love them both lol.