![]() |
i not going to stop till this girl is behind bars :(:mad:
|
Teenage girl charged with assault on elderly Sikh man in Coventry city centre
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/new...lderly-5747334
Quote:
|
Unemployed 19yr old, eh? So we taxpayers are maintaining scum like this.
What a world! :rolleyes: |
We taxpayers are maintaining far more decent people than we are people like her.
This girl is not representative of the unemployed, any more than she is representative of her generation. Also: Jobseekers Allowance is taxed. So the unemployed are also paying to maintain this girl. And she herself is paying tax. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Admittedly as a youngster on the lowest rate she probably doesn't hit the threshold. But she is paying NI contributions If someone claims benefit for six months then gets a job and works for six months the JSA they received in that first six months would count as taxable income just as it would had they been in a low paying job. |
I did not say JSA is not taxable. I said it is way below the tax threshold - currently £9440 a year or £181.54 a week.
Unless scumgirl's JSA is more than £181.54 a week she will not pay tax. Hope that clears things up for you. |
Ahhh. Yes it does. But the distinction between 'taxpayers' and 'the unemployed' is an unfair one. They're still 'tax payers'; they just don't earn enough to pay tax:-p
We don't generally, as a society, distinguish between 'taxpayers' (used as a kind of synonym for 'citizen' and the low paid. Someone working a 35 hour week and earning £9k per annum is still included in the cultural designation of 'taxpayer'. |
Quote:
|
She is scum, yes. She deserves to be punished, yes. Though, if people have a problem with their tax money paying to support people like her then it's worth noting that prison costs a hell of a lot more than unemployment benefits.
My point, rather clumsily made I admit, is that this statement: 'So we taxpayers are maintaining scum like this'. Draws on a false divide. Most people on benefits aren't like her, they're like 'us'. In fact, they are us. They're our relatives and friends, and occasionally ourselves. Most people on the dole are there temporarily. Either side of that claim they are tax payers. Do they stop being 'them' and start being 'us'? When someone loses a job they've worked in for ten years are they no longer 'us', have they become 'them'? 'We taxpayers' are not supporting 'scum like her'. That suggests a whole class of people just like her. It suggests that she is somehow representative of those on unemployment benefits. She is not. She is an aberration. Had she been seventeen and still in receipt of child benefits nobody would have made this statement: 'So we taxpayers are maintaining scum like this.' Likewise had she been in low paid work topped up by tax credits. Nor indeed, had she been in university with her course heavily subsidized by the public purse. Her status as unemployed is irrelevant. We are not supporting 'people like her'. 'We taxpayers' are supporting people like me and you. |
Quote:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l3...0ro1o1_500.jpg |
ok....ya lost me there Jesus...?
|
I lose a lot of people. It's the scene in dumber where he's trying to say how he feels about Mary Swanson. He wants to say she makes him feel like a schoolboy and he desperately wants to make love to her, but he gets his words mixed up and that sentence comes flying out of his mouth instead.
Take it as praise and move on. It doesn't happen very often! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thankyou :) |
Quote:
|
This is absolutely ridiculous.
They should be locked up for a minimum of 5 years, both of them. To beat someone up is one thing, to spit in someones face is another, but god help me, to beat up an elderly person and then film it? Absolute disgrace. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.