![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The point in my post still stands though, he doesn't constantly bring up deaf children like some have suggested. And even now he has said he would give some to charity, he isn't the only housemate to have said that. |
Quote:
Although if you're playing the good guy one moment and the aggressor (not saying he is but we'll see) later then you've changed your gameplan and it's arguably the same (though I don't necessarily see it as bad or evil) Difference and trouble with Sam is, there are external moral issues from the outside world being dragged in. Whether they should be is all up for debate. But if you're playing the straight man on a moral platform, expect to be questioned for your GP whether you should or shouldn't be judged. Although it's fair to note, Sam made an issue of them by taking them into the house. That's why I prefer to focus on people's tactics and if they're playing their game well than jumping on any moral high horse. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Does it really matter who does what with the prize money if they win? why does anyone care about that?
This isn't a charity fund raising programme, this is an entertainment show, the best HM should win. BTW, I don't believe for one second that Sam will give the money to charity. |
Quote:
Then we could learn something of use about these deafness issues. If his gameplan was to raise awareness then has he put enough effort in ? Quote:
I wouldn't say he's an 'immorral hypocrite' or anything, just that his gameplan's been busted somewhat. (although hey, who's hasn't ?) |
People referring to Sam being a bully and being against him for saying he'd give some of his money to charity are a bit rich.
Haven't Dexter and Gina been lying about others and setting them up to be evicted all series. That's why the others have had to stay quiet, Dexter and Gina's tactics of lying about and trying to turn people against their opponents has led to some, who were wise enough to stay quiet to avoid being set up for eviction, that has led others to be boring. Now that's what I call bullying and now that the most honest and decent one who stayed quiet till he was able to speak up and not get evicted like all the others they targeted and got evicted IE Sallie,Jemima etc everyone really is speaking up he is ironically being accused of the same things Gina and Dexter have been up to and worshipped for all series. Like I've said as has been witnessed everytime anyone stood up to them Gina and Dexter got them evicted, it shows who the real bullies are and it shows that bullies are good at giving out s**t to their opponents but can't take it and whinge when it comes back |
On the question of giving money away to charity......I don't have a hotline to mystic meg and neither do other FM,s so why are we accusing these HM,s of lying. Maybe Gina and Dexter will take the money and run and Sam might give it all away. Who are we to accuse or suggest who is wrong without evidence. Isnt that what Dexter and ginas supporters have been saying all along....IE We don't care about outside the house or even things that cant be proved. I see no argument about what or who will do after the show is finished so we don't reserve the right to slag them off devoid of evidence.
|
Quote:
But if people like Sam say they don't want the money one moment and then claim they do, you start to wonder if their gameplan has been rumbled. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Will someone just tell me that Sam is not a coward by not saying the same thing to Daley?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Seems to me like the volume of anti sam comments on here must give him the crown of being the most lethal game player, ergo, the one that should win seeing as how we are all talking about sam now not Dexter. Has Dexter been dethroned.
|
Quote:
"Right, let get one thing straight, I don't want the money" was the very first thing he said. He didn't NEED to mention it at all and could have just said he wanted to stay. (which tbf he did) So it's not unthinkable he really did want the money (as we've later seen) As I said, nothing wrong with wanting the money but I'm looking for consistency. If he went with a "genuine good guy" game plan then for me, there's a few doubts about it now. If he's gonna be walk away with the cash for being this altruistic good guy, then I may have a problem with it when his behaviour and actions don't show consistency. For example - why did he not pick up the twins for THEIR decision to take the money ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.