I'm confused reading this thread.
So Andrew Mitchell called the copper a pleb right?
So what did the police do wrong?Sold the story?

Correct

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...7098530351.jpg

I'm on the side that told the truth arista, why is that so hard to understand?
Andrew Mitchell lied and lied and lied again, he created a whirlpool of distrust in the police that caused untold damage to their reputation and that of the individual officers involved.
This elitist attitude from those who work for the public has to be addressed, they are not above the law. If that means exposure via the media so be it.

What a stupid arrogant prick this politician is, he was advised not to take legal action against the Sun as there was no definitive evidence either way so the word of the judge would decide the verdict.

He was told not to gamble millions of pounds in costs if he lost but he decided the judge would see it in his favour .

A fool and his money are easily parted.

The arrogance of the man is simply astounding.....





.

OK just so long
as this is the real truth
as so many "other" coppers in this were Corrupt.

If you wanted to use a MP
he would be Ideal plus using the Power Paper The Sun

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-762x428.jpg

:joker:

'But the judge said PC Rowland was "not the sort of man who would have had the wit, imagination or inclination to invent on the spur of the moment an account of what a senior politician had said to him in temper".'

What does he think he is.. some kind of pleb or summat? ;)