ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB13 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=635)
-   -   Who was right in the Cherry Brandy argument? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=245127)

Robodog 21-01-2014 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy (Post 6645771)
He never mentioned it on purpose though.

Huskies: Did yous have alcohol
Ollie: No
Jim: They even gave us brandy but we never drank any
Linda: I DID!

Goes on to cause an argument blaming everything on Jim!

Seriously what are people watching :shrug:

Exactly right.

Jim was only saying it to make the huskies feel supported by the rest of the house by letting them know they didn't drink the brandy.

Jim was actually being kind to Linda by pretending she didn't drink it too ! (even though she did drink it!!)

Insane that people can blame Jim for this one.

Seraphim 21-01-2014 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zee (Post 6645848)
It was such a non-issue anyway until Linda turned it into one, and she only turned it into an issue because Dappy said "thanks Jim"! Jesus...

Exactly - Linda happily told them she'd drunk it, and even described what it tasted like.

Quote:

Ollie said they didn't have any alcohol at all before Jim even opened his mouth.
I think they'd decided not to let the others know they'd been drinking, in case it made them feel worse, hence Ollie's fib. Linda then made him look bad because she told them they'd all been drinking wine. By the end of her rant she'd changed it to Jim drinking all the wine.

I cannot believe that anyone could possibly think Jim was responsible for this!

Kizzy 21-01-2014 11:39 PM

I've come to the conclusion linda should just keep shtum, it apparent what he's trying to do.

Slevin 22-01-2014 04:51 AM

they were both a couple of ass clowns. i thank em for it.

Ammi 22-01-2014 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petemitch123 (Post 6645729)
Lets not be biased towards your fave.

Was Jim right to bring up the cherry brandy thing.
Was Linda right to say that Jim had red wine too and that he was picking on her.
Were they both in the wrong?
Are you too scared to hold an opinion?

..he wasn't 'right' to bring up the cherry brandy as such in that there wasn't any need to mention it at all and even if he did do it to make himself look good as with the 'not eating if they can't..' thing, it was still nothing that was going to be a big deal until Linda made it a big deal because she can't bare the thought of Jim looking good or nice or anything positive in anyone's eyes...her hatred is eating her up from the inside and she sees nothing he does as anything other than a personal attack on her...

Niamh. 22-01-2014 09:03 AM

Jim, don't like the man but Linda was being an argumentative, irrational twat

HBB1508 22-01-2014 09:26 AM

Jim - Linda was just gunning for another fight silly moo that she is.

bez87 22-01-2014 09:29 AM

All he was doing was giving lusia, dappy, casey and lee abit of support by saying we have drank nothing and we got some brandy shakes and we never drank any.

Linda on the other hand just found this as a way to have a go at Jim and pretty much made an argument with herself lol

Kizzy 22-01-2014 09:38 AM

He did it to make linda look disloyal.... he even presented them with the evidence.
I'm glad she mentioned the fact he drank.

Cherie 22-01-2014 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6647084)
He did it to make linda look disloyal.... he even presented them with the evidence.
I'm glad she mentioned the fact he drank.

He had no intention of bringing them out until she kicked off. :laugh:

Jordan. 22-01-2014 10:37 AM

No one was right, Jim shouldn't have brought it up and Linda shouldn't have took the bait. The obsessive stanning will continue tho.

Z 22-01-2014 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6647232)
No one was right, Jim shouldn't have brought it up and Linda shouldn't have took the bait. The obsessive stanning will continue tho.

Disregarding the bit in bold precisely because no one was right, there were no sides to be taken here, Jim made a comment and Linda made it about her and got offended by it. It has nothing to do with "obsessive stanning" it's just calling it like I see it. Linda hates Jim and believes that her hate of him can be justified because she really believes that everything he says is a dig at her... which means that it doesn't matter whether or not he is making comments aimed at her, she's always going to assume that everything he says is an attempt to undermine her. The only "obsessive" behaviour is Linda's, not anyone at home viewing.

Vanessa 22-01-2014 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zee (Post 6647332)
Disregarding the bit in bold precisely because no one was right, there were no sides to be taken here, Jim made a comment and Linda made it about her and got offended by it. It has nothing to do with "obsessive stanning" it's just calling it like I see it. Linda hates Jim and believes that her hate of him can be justified because she really believes that everything he says is a dig at her... which means that it doesn't matter whether or not he is making comments aimed at her, she's always going to assume that everything he says is an attempt to undermine her. The only "obsessive" behaviour is Linda's, not anyone at home viewing.

:worship::worship::worship:

Pincho Paxton 22-01-2014 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6647232)
No one was right, Jim shouldn't have brought it up and Linda shouldn't have took the bait. The obsessive stanning will continue tho.

You seem to be going by what Linda said. You should ignore what Linda said as it was an emotional outburst, and not a logical outburst. She said "Jim is trying to make me look bad!", that was paranoia.

Kizzy 22-01-2014 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 6647086)
He had no intention of bringing them out until she kicked off. :laugh:

And the reason he mentioned them at all?...
He paraded them out to prove how linda was the only one to drink hers out of the group to show lil dappy how 'mummy' didn't love him anymore :laugh:

Pincho Paxton 22-01-2014 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6647373)
And the reason he mentioned them at all?...
He paraded them out to prove how linda was the only one to drink hers out of the group to show lil dappy how 'mummy' didn't love him anymore :laugh:

You actually believe that? Did you watch it?

flamingGalah! 22-01-2014 11:19 AM

Jim obviously.

He wasn't there when they say 'Don't mention the alcohol' & all Jim said was they got given cherry Brandy's but they didn't drink them, then stupid bitch Linda piped up "I did", then blames Jim for making her look bad?!? WTF! Linda is *******ed in the head... :crazy:

Seraphim 22-01-2014 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6647232)
No one was right, Jim shouldn't have brought it up and Linda shouldn't have took the bait. The obsessive stanning will continue tho.

Why shouldn't he have brought them up? There's nothing wrong with that. He said they hadn't drunk them.

Lex 22-01-2014 12:00 PM

:joker: Got to laugh at the four 'Jim-Haters' that voted for Linda!...You just couldn't make it up could you!...:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:: joker:

vikram84 22-01-2014 12:04 PM

Jim!!!!! All he said was that they got cherry brandys but they didn't drink them. Absolutely no need for an argument.

joeysteele 22-01-2014 12:39 PM

It seems a valid point is being missed here no matter how many say it.

They were asked if they had got any alcohol, firstly it was Ollie that chose to answer and said no.

Jim then added that they got cherry brandy's brought in but they didn't drink them,he never added but Linda did and in fact I hadn't realised that the others apart from Lnda hadn't drunk them either.

Things all left there would have been fine.

Then enter Linda who had to state firstly she had drank hers and then she chose to go on and try to make it out that Jim had only brought it up because he knew she hadn't.
The woman shouldn't be out in public, she could start another war with her hatred,she is totally pathetic and ridiculous.

When Ollie said they hadn't had any alcohol, Jim didn't pipe up and contradict him saying he,Jim, had wine.

Linda just cannot leave things as they are said, she has to twist everything back round to her and Jim, I wonder if at some time since she is clearly obsessed to a degree as to him, that he has knocked her back some time in her earlier career.
She hates him, she says, yet she seems to want to control what he can say, when he can say it and how he says it and to whom,even to the point of what he does too in the house.

The woman is beyond even pity now for me.

Lee. 22-01-2014 12:46 PM

Jim. Linda's so nasty and bitter, you can see it in her face even when she's not talking/spouting off

Vanessa 22-01-2014 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee. (Post 6647653)
Jim. Linda's so nasty and bitter, you can see it in her face even when she's not talking/spouting off

Jim can't do anything, without her disapproving. He has the patience of a saint with her. :angel:

MachoPoodle 22-01-2014 12:53 PM

Can't stand passive aggressive **** stirrers, and I'm glad Linda didn't let him get away with his pathetic attempts to once again make himself look good. That halo he's put on himself needs to be firmly knocked off.

Pincho Paxton 22-01-2014 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MachoPoodle (Post 6647673)
Can't stand passive aggressive **** stirrers, and I'm glad Linda didn't let him get away with his pathetic attempts to once again make himself look good. That halo he's put on himself needs to be firmly knocked off.

The only way it would be Jim's fault is if he went back in time, and impregnated Linda's mom.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.