Originally Posted by delta (Post 6663063)

The problem with Linda Nolan is she divided the house along the lines of sexism and feminism and Luisa and Sam F were sucked in, she needed a network of men haters around her to bolster her , almost obsessional, hatred of Jim.

It must have been very uncomfortable for Jim Davison being in the house and I am surprised he kept his cool. Notice now the instigator of all the hate has been removed how the house dynamics have changed? For Linda Nolan to use Luisa's mantra about the 46 minutes that we see and that she was never voted for by her fellow housemates all I can say about that, Jim or anyone else doesn't choose which minutes the viewers will see and just because someone doesn't get voted for by their fellow housemates doesn't mean to say that they are popular or well liked, a lot can slip under the radar. Jim and Liz were very easy targets, for what I consider to be a very weak, almost spineless, set of individuals.

In years gone past, numerous people have gone on to win big brother who have been voted for week after week. Life is a game and CBB & BB replicate it in minutiae, they are all playing the game of life with TV cameras on them and they will quite easy vote either for the softest target or the biggest threat. You can include Jim in both of those.

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6663081)

Why can no one have an opinion on Jim without getting labeled? The names thrown around on here are so childish.

Originally Posted by Seraphim (Post 6663025)

:laugh2:

Well, to be fair to Jim, she was just being mean. He has at least two other faces, :joker: and she was just taking the piss out of the 'victim' behaviour to get a laugh. I haven't a lot of respect for that woman. I don't like the tone of her comments generally and I didn't think her input was all that helpful to Linda. It's not that great for people to go through life domineering other people into agreeing with them, and kicking off towards people she doesn't like. Linda is currently unemployed and there aren't many workplaces where she'd be allowed to exhibit behaviour like that. If she'd worked in my profession, she'd have been sacked.

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6663092)

I find it hilarious when people assume what they're seeing in the house is feminism. I have never heard a feminist say "you shouldn't swear at a woman". It seems to me they're all feminists when it suits them, and use their sexuality liberally to get what they want the rest of the time.

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 6663067)

Funny to compare last nights main show to last nights BOTP

The main show had Jim having insightful psychological conversations with the HMs and managed to compliment them and make them all smile (including Luisa)

The BOTP show had 2 professional 'psychologists' giving their insights about the HMs and only managed to insult them and (unlike Jim) made nobody smile. Far from it.

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6663093)

Her grievance was valid, nobody knows how they would react in similar circumstances, I think she coped very well.
You didn't care for the psychologists tone? That's unfortunate maybe she should adopt rylans screeching tones....or john mccrirricks booming chauvinism?
You can't go through life allowing yourself to be manipulated and humiliated, if you need to make a stand do it.... Don't be shouted down by those who make disparaging comments about women in the vain hope of strengthening their argument.
Let's leave that to UKIP.

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6663009)

Same whining every series when something negative is said about the favourite on bots :sleep:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6663081)

Why can no one have an opinion on Jim without getting labeled? The names thrown around on here are so childish.

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 6663131)

You win the thread, time to close it now

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 6663116)

Rylan and John aren't claiming to be psychologists.

Rachel and Kate are.

But they acted and spoke tonight like John and other such regular opinionated panelists. That's the problem.

Originally Posted by MrWong (Post 6663125)

For those rubbishing the opinion of Rachel Morris, what are your qualifications in that field?

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6663167)

I don't feel they did, they vocalised how they felt events in the house played out very well with honesty and conviction.... no histrionics necessary.
Female professionals offering an opinion shouldn't be castigated and labelled witches and feminists, it's rather silly.

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 6663156)

When it was Carol Mcgiffin being the most pleasant about Jim, the alarm bells were ringing.

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 6663172)

Rylan went from Friday nights BOTS where imo he went from his best ever presenting and interviewing of Linda to Saturdays show where he was dire and controlled instead of being in control.

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 6663172)

Rylan went from Friday nights BOTS where imo he went from his best ever presenting and interviewing of Linda to Saturdays show where he was dire and controlled instead of being in control.

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 6663189)

Same for me too.

Also while at Uni, I have seen so called professional Psychologists cause more distress to students with their problems and difficulties than just alking things through with their friends likely would.

They often generalise their advice and analysis on a one fits all assessment.
That is often not the case at all and how come we only get these near nutcases of psychologists on BB,their services don't seem to be in demand anywhere else.

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 6663169)

Their gender is not an issue here.

Their professionalism is.

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6663212)

What did you feel was unprofessional about what they said?

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 6662992)

Defending a man accused of sexism by accusing an all female panel of feminism?
Imo they were spot on.... couldn't have put it better myself!
He does have 2 faces, 'poor me!' and 'who me?'
Apart from his beetroot 'merlot me' face obv.... :laugh;