![]() |
Quote:
..yeah, we just ignore the Welfare officer though, Cherie..:wink:... |
Quote:
|
and think of all the holiday and inservice days
|
Quote:
For all those who probably won't bother to read back through the thread today's strike in part is about a government proposal to take away the responsibility for schools from the Local Authority and have them run by private business (presumably for a profit). Nobody has yet commented on this, so I wait with bated breath a response. |
Can they not do this in term though?
|
Quote:
Soon you will only be able to get a decent education if you pay for it, and 'free' schools will be for those that can't, staffed with 'teachers' with an NVQ. How many kids will get to university with a system like that? Only the elite. |
Quote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-26729786 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.hackneygazette.co.uk/news...tion_1_3485740 “Teachers will not stand by and let Michael Gove and this government destroy the education system,” he said. “Gove’s policy of creeping privatisation includes the deregulation of teacher’s pay and conditions - we will not let that happen.” |
..oh I also meant to say Cherie that I read the link, yeah I was aware of that but it's not a recent thing..?...if anything, the schools here have increased the LSA's hours over the last few years and employed more, a lot of them HLSAs because what the government says makes no sense whatsoever...there isn't the budget to always get supply teachers and a lot of supply teachers are nowhere near as good as an LSA who knows the children/school/timetable etc ..obviously we're a primary school and don't have specialist topic teachers though...but how are they going to fund more teaching staff when none of the support workers have had a salary increase for over 4 years and it's just been extended to another 4 years...?...crazy....
|
Lazy bastards tbh :hmph:
I usually don't complain about a day off, but I'd have rather gone in today. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the whole point of a strike is disruption so they draw attention to it. Quote:
Quote:
It is fairly recent, I think it came up some time last year, we recently signed a petition about it through our Union Rep so it is an ongoing proposal. |
Quote:
|
Its great I have a half day :)
|
Quote:
overnment ministers have started talks to phase out teaching assistants in England to save £4 billion a year, but heads and parents are likely to oppose the move. There are currently 232,000 teaching assistants, three times the number in 2000. The last government introduced them to ease pressure on teachers and give them more time to prepare lessons and mark work. Phasing teaching assistants out would enable schools to hire more teachers and reduce the DfE’s budget, and would probably take several years. The think-tank Reform questions the value for money of teaching assistants and claims that their impact on educational outcomes for pupils is ‘negligible’. Its research director Thomas Cawston said: “We found that while they were supposed to help teachers, they were actually being allowed to take classes themselves. Not being prepared or qualified to so those classes, they were not doing a very good job. The money spent on teaching assistants would be far better spent on improving the quality of teachers.” |
[QUOTE=Cherie;6770881]I suppose it would be less costly if you got rid of 10 TAs and just appointed one qualified teacher!
overnment ministers have started talks to phase out teaching assistants in England to save £4 billion a year, but heads and parents are likely to oppose the move. There are currently 232,000 teaching assistants, three times the number in 2000. The last government introduced them to ease pressure on teachers and give them more time to prepare lessons and mark work. Phasing teaching assistants out would enable schools to hire more teachers and reduce the DfE’s budget, and would probably take several years. The think-tank Reform questions the value for money of teaching assistants and claims that their impact on educational outcomes for pupils is ‘negligible’. Its research director Thomas Cawston said: “We found that while they were supposed to help teachers, they were actually being allowed to take classes themselves. Not being prepared or qualified to so those classes, they were not doing a very good job. The money spent on teaching assistants would be far better spent on improving the quality of teachers.”[/QUOTE] ..it won't be spent on that though, will it...some teaching assistants are far better qualified to teach and better at teaching than supply teachers and far, far cheaper... |
[QUOTE=Ammi;6770892]
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=Cherie;6770936]
Quote:
|
Well that Corrupt Union (NUT) only got 40%
so militants are needed to Buff it all up in front of SkyNewsHD Live in Central London today |
Quote:
|
Yes 6th Form Colleges got the Legal OK
by a Judge So students will Join Teachers on Strike? |
I would hate to be a teacher,I know someone who is and they work a lot more than likely people think, a good bit of it from home outside of term times,preparing for term time and also as to assessing pupils progress or lack of it.
Good luck to them if this is the only way to get their voices really heard. like Doctors as to health and care,my guess is teachers know far more about educating children than those in govt. |
I'm with Cherie on this.
The privatisation kick that the Tories are on needs to be stopped and it's foolish to discredit the strike just because you're jealous of the Holiday time. If you had to deal with hateful inbred brats every day you'd need a six week holiday too. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.