No they didn't. We didn't know Aisleyene would be evicting one of the new housemates in BB7 until the live show.

They only reveal full details ahead when it's needed because of a public vote for things like fake evictions.

No need to this time with no public vote occurring.

The second half of BB7 was indeed the beginning of ridiculous levels of manipulation. BB8 went into overdrive.

If they are planning on evicting someone the public have just voted to save, they might want to know about that.

The house next door wasn't manipulation against anyone. They were all newbies, the public voted Aisleyene through.

The public haven't voted to save anyone, it's vote to evict this year.

I was thinking more of Nikki being evicted and then voted back.



There was clearly a campaign to save Ashleigh by voting out Jale, as you well know. Head-to-head is essentially the same thing anyway.

There hasn't been a head to head, apart from 10 minutes after the vote freeze.

That doesn't mean they can't do this twist because the public "saved" anyone. People will vote to evict each of the housemates for any number of reasons, being fans of one of the other housemates being one of them.

This is exactly why there's no way it's a real eviction. People spent a lot / voted hard to evict Jale over Ashleigh and now Ashleigh has a high chance of being evicted a few days later with no public vote? They'll never do it. They'd be in dodgy ground verging on fraud, and risk having their ability to make money from phone votes removed completely. I just dony think they're that stupid. They are QUITE stupid though, so maybe.

That's just a technicality. It's obvious (in legal terms) that people voted on Friday to save Ashleigh and on the understanding that Ashleigh would be safe until the next public vote (barring walking out or being ejected for a rule break). People would be well within their rights to demand a refund for their phone votes over the past week, should Ashleigh be evicted on Monday without a public vote.

No well not really, the Armageddon twist was confirmed before Fridays eviction so people voted knowing Ashleigh was only potentially safe until Monday..and since it was vote to evict and not save then I don't see how that could be a valid reason to complain anyway..?

This. :thumbs:

No, no, no, they wouldn't.

The phone vote is a "Vote to Evict" vote. People who voted for Jale have no "right to demand" anything at all. They voted to evict a housemate, a housemate is evicted.

Doesn't entitle them to anything, nor does it mean the saved nominees are guaranteed anything.

The vote was for Friday's eviction. All housemates then being put through to the next eviction which has nothing to do with previous phone votes.

Exactly.

3rd house mate could be a model

We all know she said "walk out the door" but what door exactly? Hmmmmm Big Brother's got something up his sleeves >:)

..I actually think it will be a proper eviction with someone leaving and then maybe a secret house as the twist on Friday when someone/some people will be 'replaced' by the new housemates but they'll go to a secret room and have the chance to go back...

I hope so .
I will be so angry if someone is evicted without a public vote .

The front door. They always do whether it's a fake eviction or not because they insist on having the front door viewable to the rest of the house.