Christ is totally genuine....he is very perceptive and he sees things for what they are. His analogy of people and their behaviour is spot on and he is so calm about everything.
He has backtracked on a couple of things and I think he does that as part of his gameplan....

He so deserves to win...

So he backtracks as part of a gameplan? How is that "totally genuine"?

the rules prohibit discussing members so I don't tend to keep track on people's opinions as a precautionary measure, of course

my actual point still stands though. he's nice, but not the realest.

Yeh bored of Chris now

His head went in the DR, he looked like a bit of an oddball, and not in a humorous way.

Well put. It's been clear from day one like a bunch of other house mates.

No one here will agree with you until it's verified because they can't think for them selves. :dance:

No.
Chris has a brain on top of his shoulders and that seems to make some people feel a bit insecure.
Not everybody is at the level where they can only find entertainment in slags who wave their tits about or miserable little tramps who sit in corners bitching.

Chris is one of the most entertaining and witty people in the house.

down to earth - feet on ground and humble - even when they said to him he apoligiesed which i don't feel he needed to.


i like chris.

I like Chris a lot, he is like one of us in a way. He watches the show from the inside and comments about it in the DR.

Another thing I would add... Let's say someone came into the house in BB1 and exposed Nasty Nick for what he was, a total sham. Would Chris have defended Nasty Nick? Would he have spoken about the unfairness of it all?

Why do people think Danielle was above and beyond being exposed for what she was? She pretended to be something she wasn't to the very people she was close to. That's not a good person, and it's something that was worth them hearing.

Chris speaks very highly of that "miserable little tramp". So is he wrong about her?

And he sits in the diary room bitching down a camera lens to the audience, behind people's backs, rarely ever standing up for what he supposedly believes is right in the actual house.

I like Chris and he was spot on with what he said tonight.

What was he spot on about? He was wrong about Danielle. It was quite right for her to be exposed for what she was.

No it wasn't. And it's not right that it's ok for her to be exposed and not Helen. If one person is allowed to be exposed, then they all should be. Their outside lives are irrelevant and as Chris said, he's judging her on the person she is in the house and as the person he lives with (as they should).

Why not? Would you have objected to Nasty Nick being exposed as someone who didn't have a wife who died in a car crash?


Why does everything come back to Helen? Forget Helen for a moment, Danielle was a fraudulent character and we all knew that.


How are their outside lives irrelevant? Is the fact Nick didn't have a wife that died in a car crash and he only said that to make himself sympathetic to the others irrelevant? Was it wrong for it to be revealed that Kim had a boyfriend and that she was withholding this important info from a man she was getting off with?

The person she was in the house was someone who was lying to him. And he wasn't interested in that. He was more interested in going to the diary room and putting on a performance.

I don't know who Nasty Nick is, but it's the same thing. And how come Helen should be forgotten about, but this Nasty Nick guy should be considered? They can come in as characters or themselves or whoever and that's all they should be judged on by the people in the house. Outside info should only be revealed at their discretion. It's supposed to be about a bunch of people in a house with no contact with the outside world, so yes, their outside lives are irrelevant unless they want them to be otherwise.

Okay, so someone coming in and exposing the original Big Brother villain for what he is would have been wrong.


Helen is not being forgotten about. She is just irrelevant to what was going on with Danielle.

Their outside lives are essential to understanding whether or not they are honest people in the house. It has always been that way. Nasty Nick started Big Brother off with all the controversy surrounding him and the lies he was telling such as having a wife that died in a car accident to make himself a more sympathetic figure. He was a manipulative person who the public turned against, but he was hugely popular in the house with the others.

Danielle was as much of a liar as he was. She was a total sham and continued to be one in the face of being exposed as such.

Helen is just a nasty piece of work. But not a sham.

One thing he's spot on about a lot of them very nasty they are and only pretend to like each other because they dont want to be put up for Eviction .

And then he goes back to them and pretends to be their friend himself...

It's a good thing that there's still enough decent people that can see Chris for the kind-hearted, decent and intelligent man he is and will support him 'til the end and hopefully help him win.:thumbs:
Saying he's "weak" because he's not a super-confident, abrasive, in your face person is a joke.:bored: Different people have different personalities and handle situations accordingly and thank god for that or we'd all be confrontational gobsh*tes like Helen!

Who does he pretend to be friends with ? Other than Ashleigh and Christopher whom I doubt he was referring to when he said there are nasty individual's in the house .

Yes, and his way of handling situations is to go to the diary room and assassinate people's characters. It's not about being "in your face" like Helen. I don't agree with that either. I just want to know why Chris is not being held to account for what seems to me to be rather duplicitous behaviour.

What was it Bianca said he had said about Helen... "I was worried you were taking Helen away from me again"

Why didn't he stand up for what he thought was right with Danielle? He could have done it in the calm and measured way he does other things, but instead we just see him in the diary room ranting behind people's backs

He's a normal person and stating the obvious, yes there is a lot of fakery going on, come on just like Danielle, he went in there so new what he was about to face and the type of wannabee personality that he would come up against.


Yeah, he's playing a game, but he's not the biggest game player I will leave that for the little sh!t bag Mark. How the hell he is sneaking under the radar is beyond me. He is one that would certainly blow if the heat was turned up on him.


Edited to say:


How fcuking cringeworthy was that 'Blue Moon' song to camera in the garden??? Has to be the most blatant, cringe of the series.

Absolutely Chris has Ashleigh and Christopher to talk who will support each other unlike Helen and her cronies who throw weak links under the bus when there no longer useful Marlon can a test to this .

Chris has actually explained in some detail why he does some of the things he does in the way he does them and it all makes sense.
The majority of the things he says in the DR are spot-on! He's the best judge of personality and character in there by a long way.