From what we have been shown no.. but how many apparent 'warnings' did Helen have which we never saw. but were used as fact? can't have it both ways.

I think he probably forgot he wasn't wearing any underwear! :joker:

You & I were thinking the same thing at the same time :shocked:

The double standards on display are incredible.

Steven and Kim have sex in a bedroom filled with other people. No warning and no real condemnation.

Kinga goes into the garden with a wine bottle and masturbates with it. No warning and no condemnation.

A brain damaged 70 year old whips his pants down to fix his knee brace and gets warned and condemned.

Nowt so queer as folk.

We have all done that before :blush2:

Even with a 'but' I bet that hurt! :p

:clap1:

Bingo!!!!!

Go re-read my first post in this thread. That is what I meant by asking if he is suddenly getting a bad edit. If previous warnings weren't shown and this one was then that would be down to the edit.

Kinga & Gary, a match made in BB heaven :shocked:

If Gary has received any other warnings, I'm SURE we would have seen them. The way the other housemates go on, and on, and on, and on, and ON about him, I'm sure the producers would include any such warnings to show, "ok, perhaps there's at least a bit of truth to what the housemates have been complaining about."

People have run naked through the BB house since the beginning. Is this warning because the affected "ladies" got all butt-hurt and decided to whine and complain to BB about it? The other housemates are desperate at this point, and will do ANYTHING to make Gary look bad.

Haha nah just using to it state a point :tongue: Helen was deemed the devil and had her '14 warnings' used against her at every opportunity, when no-one saw any evidence of said warning, so for someone to say Gary hasn't had warnings because we haven't seen them, is incredibly hypercritical :laugh:

Not sure about this. Streakers are arrested of both sexes at sporting events.

Keep it in the park or beach, i say

But that isn't what I said. Re-read my first post. You got the wrong end of the stick in your haste to troll.:laugh:

Doesn't the woman have to be breast feeding an infant?

Okay, so swing it around, You agree that he could have been getting an unfairly good edit up until now then?

women expose their bits most series including frenchy, its pathetic and they never get warned. just 1 of 10001 other biased sexist rules for women against men

Stop accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being a troll, your opinion isn't the be all and end all of this forum, it's rude and disrespectful :idc:

There was an older guy with glasses who kept exposing himself to the girls in one of the BB's, can't remember which one, but he never got a warning

It depends how you define unfairly good. Other housemates might have had warnings not shown so comparatively Gary's edit would be no worse or better than theirs.


I am saying that BB might suddenly be doing everything to ensure Gary doesn't win.

Where have I done that?

Nobody is condemning him. Just saying he was right to be warned.
In the examples you give above nobody was displaying their private parts in a kitchen of all places with women present. Surely you can see that is not socially acceptable behaviour?

After the Helen, lap dance ffs. And she enjoyed it.

You have accused many people of 'trolling' whenever they disagree with you, me included on several occasions, just grow up and accept that not everyone agrees with you and stop belittling people who don't.

Which is more disrespectful in your opinion:

1) A 70 year old brain damaged man pulling his pants down to fix a knee brace.

2) A young woman masturbating with a wine bottle in public.

Hint: If your answer is number one then you might want to re-evaluate your morals.

I think men have exposed themselves a number of times in the BB house without it being a warning. I think the warning was based on the reaction of Dee to placate her to an extent. If she hadn't said anything, there would have been no warning