Creggle |
07-11-2014 08:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
(Post 7362730)
Your first comment... they would have no intention of backing off. It's not just the west they're against. They kill anyone who doesn't agree with their doctrine, including other Muslims. You seem under the impression they're freedom fighters of some kind, but they're not.
Your second comment, they have taken people who are working for humanitarian purposes, helping people, giving them aid... and ISIL have slaughtered them. I think we can complain, quite loudly, when they do this.
ISIL have no regard for human life. They slaughter in the most barbaric ways, they use rape as a weapon of war, they are indiscriminate in their cruelty. Once they are captured and their guilt proven, I have no problem with them being executed to stop them infesting the world.
|
If only... I don't see anything wrong with our forces secretly torturing and then executing confirmed terrorists, maybe if word got out and the other side started to ramp up the sh!t they did to our boys when captured, that would be the only reason not to torture these scum. For all we know, we may be torturing them, I hope so anyway. If they are hopefully they are killing them once they're finished. :fc:
They deserve no mercy, no pity, nothing. The Geneva convention should rite them off and allow any countries military to fight them however they personally see fit. The soldier a while back who shot a wounded terrorist in the head got punished, what a joke.
I think the moralists among us need to realise that torturing these worthless piles of filth isn't going to set a bad example and will not cause the enemy to do worse things, they are at 10 and in reality the dial doesn't go up to 11. It's quite frankly time the gloves came off and we got the green light to fight them properly. Shoot to kill, incendiary, white phosphorus, torture, capture & questioning anyone associated with a terrorist over there or here, whatever it takes.
|