I think one perfectly good reason for her to have had to resign is the fact she chose,without any discussion with the occupier, to photograph and then tweet his home on the internet.

I would be livid if someone tweeted my home at present without my permission, no matter who they were.

She is not a new politician, she is a well experienced one and no matter what she thought of the flags or the house or the likely occupant/s, she had no right at all to tweet his home.

Ed Miliband was 100% correct to step in,totally justified to be furious at someone who should have known much better and finally to be happy she resigned from his front bench.
I really have no sympathy at all for her, in fact if someone was taking a photo of the house I live in at present, I would challenge them as to why they were doing so.

Stereotyping is wrong :hehe:

Lol.I know but i'm not an MP:hehe:

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-720x960.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-720x960.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-720x960.jpg

Are those 'Rosary Beads' around his neck, or the Egyptian Ankh?

Looks like

Steve Richards' is a good piece on it:

Yes MTVN, it more or less echoes my own views.

Emily Thornberry is an horrendous snob and the worst kind of champagne socialist. Good riddance, and shame on her for adding more fuel to the UKIP fire in proclaiming themselves the Party of the Working Class.

Not being funny but this is insanely over sensitive. I'm sure a good 70% of this country would roll their eyes if someone else draped flags around their house like that in a similar fashion. Obviously it's all to do with the pragmatics of what she wrote but still, it's chavvy and tacky..

You and I disagree on who we want to see win the next election,however I always respect your views even when they are at massive odds with mine.

I do however have to agree with just about all you said in your post above and I as a Labour supporter was absolutely furious,really angry, as to her too for this.
As I said, what on earth was she thinking, photographing someone elses home without their permission and then tweeting it across the internet.
Some well established MPs seem to have some sort of a death wish about them at the minute politically.

All they have to do is think before they speak, really give deep thought to anything before they act and do a bit more listening than talking.
Why on earth should that be so hard for them to take on board.

To be fair to her 3/4 of the commons would be considered snobs, and most of the cabinet have a considerable property and investment portfolio... Labour have been and are the party for the working class that's not to say they can't invest wisely.
That said I abhor this kind of attitude, it smacks of the 'haven't I done well' scoffers who laugh up their sleeve at anyone who they deem to be of a lower social standing. This story is shocking in that you expect it from the conservatives, but when it's a Labour MP it hurts that bit more.
Fair play to Ed instead of excusing this and brushing off the incident he got rid, I for one think it shows he has the principles of the Labour party at heart here.

I think Blair took that away.




UKIP now picks up many Working Class
voters.

Exactly Arista - which is the very point I was making in my earlier post and - I believe - the real reason Thornberry took this photo -- because it encompasses all the factors which say: "Look you main party political fecks -- this is the reality of grass roots voters in Britain, This is what we're up against".

I am not excusing the woman - I don't even vote Labour - merely examining the reasons why she may have done what she did.

As for 'snobbery' or 'looking down on the working classes' - Thornberry may well be a snob, but I don't believe this came into it. It's a photo which merely, but comprehensively portrays the truth.

I don't know about other people's experiences on here, but in my experience, council estates and areas which are predominantly lower value terrace houses - once the bastions of labour voters - are now increasingly festooned with St George flags hanging from their windows, and adorned with 'Vote UKIP' or even 'Vote BNP' posters in those windows, and the main political parties almost treasonous inability to deal with our insane immigration policies is the sole reason for it.

This is the reality of the changing face of British politics and it does not need Thornberry's controversial photo to confirm it - even if it does.

Well it looks like it's been put back, UKIP pick up the ignorant and the arrogant.

Yes Niall - you are 100% correct. Insanely 'over-sensitive' is what this is. But as for 'chavvy and tacky' - like UKIP and the Flags of St George - 'chavvy and tacky' is exactly where society is continuously descending to.

Not every council estate in the UK is a replica of shameless chatsworth you know....

[QUOTE=Kizzy;7387901]To be fair to her 3/4 of the commons would be considered snobs, and most of the cabinet have a considerable property and investment portfolio... Labour have been and are the party for the working class that's not to say they can't invest wisely.
That said I abhor this kind of attitude, it smacks of the 'haven't I done well' scoffers who laugh up their sleeve at anyone who they deem to be of a lower social standing. This story is shocking in that you expect it from the conservatives, but when it's a Labour MP it hurts that bit more.
Fair play to Ed instead of excusing this and brushing off the incident he got rid, I for one think it shows he has the principles of the Labour party at heart here.[/QUOTE]

Fair play to him indeed,as you say no excusing, no saying he will stand by her,no time wasting.
I commend him for that leadership quality of dealing with this issue so rapidly.

Every speech he has made has been reaching out to the harder driven working classes and those who are the most vulnerable of workers and the unemployed.
I was really impressed with his no apologies and no nonsense approach once this problem arose with Emily Thornberry.

No wonder he was furious, I was too at her, and I am glad he dealt with it the way he did.
A far cry for the present PM,who allows things to rumble on, swearing total support for the MP then having to let them go much later.

I realise that Kizzy, but a lot of them are. And don't get me wrong, I have seen the same flags and posters supporting UKIP and the BNP in some windows of detached houses in the £300,00 upwards value bracket, though not as prevalent.

I believe though - that if the two main parties do not seriously address the issue of immigration with real purpose, then such sights will not only become more prevalent but also the realities behind this prevalence, will increasingly manifest themselves at the ballot box.

Immigration policies dictated by 'Political Correctness' are creating the very phenomena which the brainless architects of such policies are trying so 'civilly' to avoid - Racism. What's more, it is increasingly, indigenous British people - of all classes - who have never been 'racist' who are becoming racist because of such policies.

It's a shame really that people are so easily stirred by the largely right wing media spinning this into some awful fiasco. I wish the people that are stirred by this and/or vote UKIP both understand that they're just playing into the hands of arch-capitalist plutocrats, and that supporting them will not make Britain great as they so badly desire.

This country so often votes stupidly, and it frustrates the hell out of me. Say what you will about me labelling the majority of this country stupid but a vote for the Tories or UKIP is nothing else in my books.

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-762x428.jpg
New Labours view on migrants
calling a English lady a Biggot

who would you advocate voting for?

labour?

:umm2:

Christ no. :umm2:

Personally I'd say the Greens. They have the most sensible set of policies of any of the parties. :idc: