Yes,I would say.
Although he seemed far more repentant as to the issue while Ken virtually seemed to scoff at what he was being pulled up about

I found it strange too that none of the guys were actually the ones making sure he was okay while being sick.

I also agree that Ken is coming out with some really inappropriate things,if he doesn't go this eviction, I can see him being told to leave too very soon.

Really eventful highlights with a lot going on, a pity it has sunk so low so early. On balance however I could see no other action BB could take as to Jeremy, no way was Chloe going to want him even in the same house as her now,never mind the same room.

If males try to touch girls boobs without their permission, females most likely slap them:laugh:

TBH he was REALLY drunk and it seemed he thought she might have been coming on to him, ok not the smoothest move in the world, happens when your that pissed, but he really could have done a LOT worse. Ken was worse. Chloe was milking it and it was really down to her how to interpret it. I am sure if she slapped his hand he would have stopped and most likely apologised no matter how drunk he was.

I wonder if he'll be at the wrap party. Daley wasn't allowed to go to the wrap party in BB14 so I doubt he will.

Yes as Jeremy thinks females are fair game ....
Chloe tries to help him and he reads that as a come on .

Same tbh

I voted no, but I do feel we weren't shown the full story (I dont mean the incident itself, but I think Chloe may have threatened to leave if he wasnt kicked out)

IMO he made a serious error in judgement. IF its true what he said about her having no end of 'wardrobe malfunctions' when alone with him in there then it does kinda muddy the waters a little. Not saying its ok to grope her, but thats not what he did. Sounds more like he made a drunken pass at her after reading the signals very wrong. I don't think it was malicious at all, however I see why Chloe was upset.

But at the same time...I feel she massively overreacted, possibly due to everyone else flapping around her. But she didn't overreact half as much as much as BB did. And Perez. My god I was starting to like him too but what a ****ing banshee he is :umm2:

Denise's pants pulling was far worse and Hazel, I feel iT was used as an excuse to remove him for other reasons

He was off his face mate.. room spinning and puking up.. not in the right frame of mind to make calculated decisions.

I think they removed him because ultimately they thought he was too unstable WITH the drink around him etc.

No, if a female had done a similar thing (just like Denise during pantsgate, which was actually just as bad if not worse, because it was in public) then they wouldn't have been removed. I believe Perez helped to get him ejected also since he kept harping on about how he didn't feel 'safe' around Jeremy in the house so Big Brother basically were left with no choice but to remove him. Without the reaction I suspect they would have given him a formal warning and left it at that and rightly so.

Also BB kinda manufactured the whole thing tbh. Didnt Jeremy say in his VT he had been in rehab for alcoholism/drugs?! Not saying being off your tits is an excuse for anything but to let a guy with obvious problems drink straight rum mixed with vodka...well...

I don't think they had much option.


Mind you, had they kept him in then Perez might have felt he was in so much danger he would have to walk..well, one can dream.

Chloe milked it for what it was. Jeremy should have just being given a warning. Stephanie in a Civilian BB used the N word without thinking and was removed from the house. Ken, (of who I'm a fan) is much older and should have know better, should have been removed. I know one person I would love to see removed and that is Perez as he just seems to be stirring things. So NO, Jeremy should not have been removed and Ken should have being shown the door (to the left).

It's difficult, Chloe's reaction made it quite hard not to remove him because she wouldn't be comfortable around him anymore which is fair enough from her perspective and that needs respected. His justification was pretty stupid as well, who thinks that a girl is trying to make a pass at them when you've got your head in a toilet? And even if he did think that, trying to expose her isn't gonna be a very good way to initiate anything :umm2: Probably best to nip it in the bud and get him out rather than risk any further damage

He had to go
 

I don't think they could do anything but evict him but I do feel a little sympathy for him because he's going to be labelled a sex pest now. It sounds more like a drunk fumble than anything though he should not have touched. I do think Chloe was stupid to be alone in the toilet with him what was that about, couldn't she help from a distance with the door open rather than getting right in there with his vom.

Yeah I mean when you add it all up... SUPER DRUNK UNSTABLE GUY + HALF NAKED MODEL IN DRESSING GOWN WITH BOOBS HANGING OVER YOUR HEAD..... Not like he raped her you get me? Think he just misread it at that moment in time. Badly.

He needs to work on his moves, prolly thought he was in one of his sex tapes lol.

.

Yes.

It may have been 'blown out of proportion' but who are we to argue that. It's based of the feelings of Chloe, so yes I agree he should have been removed.

I'm surprised they were even allowed vodka and rum.

Isn't it normally just beer/cider and win they're provided with?

He made a serious error of judgment, he was happy to accept so, yes it was the right move. I hope he gets whatever help he needs.

Sad I was hoping the show would turn his life around.

He was wrong and deserved to be punished somehow but not evicted. Ill give him his dues though, he didn't try to wriggle out of it, he stood up and took his punishment. Chloe milked it and I think she might regret it in time. Would she have acted like that if it was Callum doing the flicking.

Good to see the special one is a BB fan :smug: