He couldn't control his Christian erection, so decides to shift the responsibility to someone else.

He was just giving her advice as any father figure would do. He has daughter/s, the proof was in the pudding look what happened with Jeremy and how upset she was. If they have to live together for a while they need to consider everyone. Didnt the women have a go at the men for weeing in the toilet? A right old fuss instead of being discrete and saying "now look here could we please...." So dont wee and be more discrete then noone will get upset or misunderstood. Good advice on everyones part. Less arguments and less Nadia and Perez being in so called control.

Well done Alex, tactful and to the point.

Responsibility in the right place, the source along with the others. He obviously had control to be able to discuss it with her.

Yes but in his eyes she wasnt safe from remarks and actions by others as we have found out. To me it was a lot of fuss over nothing and Jeremy shouldnt have been ejected, a misunderstading which I am sure Chloe didnt expect that result. As was pointed out to her by Michelle in a very crafty way, Jeremy was drunk. So we are two down because of useless actions and remarks. Better to be armed and know the reasons why then it is up to the individual.

[QUOTE=InOne;7477956]Was really weird. I thought she got a bit patronized and probably made her feel quite awkward and rubbish. Yes he did it in quiet calm manner but it seemed passive aggressive and controlling. Especially after the whole Jeremy thing.[/QUOTE

I thought it was ok in the context of what Ken had been saying etc. He called her over, gave her a bit of advice, seems he has a daughter her age and she said Ok that's kool. She didn't look in the least awkward as she walked back to where she had been

I agree Kizzy

I think it was quite a nice moment on Alexander's behalf, it made me like him even more.

I saw it as a father of girls around Chloe's age, not wanting to see a young girl be ogled at, he even said 'I turn away' when she gets dressed, it was the best way to tell her that she's free to do whats he wants, but to be more aware of her surrounding while doing so.

Good on him, a genuinely nice guy :clap1:

He was tactful and respectful to CHloe addressing a personal issue unlike Ken who insisted on talking to Chloe while the whole house was present.

That's just her normal stunned mullet face :laugh:

I think in view of what happened with Jeremy it was wise to have the whole house present. :joker:

Can't really see the difference myself, Alexander told her to rethink undressing/dressing in front of strangers,

Ken told her to be a bit more self aware and not put herself in a compromising position with strangers especially if they protray themselves as loose cannons as Jeremy did.

Result
Alexander being given a Knighthood
Ken lambasted and called all sorts

:joker:

The way they said it pays a large part. Alex took her one side and was more like a father the way he was stroking her arm and comforting her. Ken was just crude and much more blunt.

The girls shouldn't be getting changed in front of the men anyway (i wouldn't because i wouldn't want to make anyone feel uncomfortable and some people do find nudity(or partial nudity) uncomfortable)
I think the way Alexander confronted her was fine, he clearly was looking at it from a fathers point of view

This ^^^^^

Come on, you're moving the goal posts a bit now... so he didn't sugar coat it big deal!

Crude? In what way was what he said crude, they have known each other less than a week he told her straight, Alexander might have taken the user friendly approach but the advice boiled down to the same thing.