![]() |
Quote:
|
The bare faced cheek of it. It's always a fix.
That show always is biased towards whoever the year's nastiest contestant is, and always avoids discussing their bad points. This year the bias has been in favour of Katie Hopkins,but they always avoid chatting about the nastiest things the year's nastiest fave has got up to I'm not saying this because I'm a fan of Perez |
Quote:
for several episodes before ? they've stopped the lie,attempted brainwashing of audience members at home recently,trying to justify backing Katie Hopkins because they lie that she is nice |
Quote:
|
OK cock eyed i can forgive but one white snooker glove ??? what planet is this twat on >> :cheer2:
|
The way he was taken out of the house was unfair, had it been after noms that would have been ok. How anyone can say he is interesting I do not know, he is totally insulting. BOTS crowds, I always remember someone on the panel being asked something about a HM, a detrimental answer was expected but the participant refused with the words "I know you want me to say blah blah blah but I disagree". So yes I think that the panel/audience is/are possbly picked to sway the public or they are possibly told beforehand the way to go. Surprising enough at the end Katie H had the greater support, the ball was chosen imo that was obviously a sham because why did they have the pictures? Why didnt they just ask the question without all the palaver.
There was a time when I would have agreed with everything which went on but over time I am now very very suspicious. I do not trust anything tbh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.