Originally Posted by Ellen (Post 7544714)

Did KH say KP was a bad mother or is a follow on from the conversation they had the other day about paying for her sons travel?

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544752)

Neither did I , I simply stated facts and if you google Harvey, he is quite the little celebrity and a lovely lad. My point is he shouldn't be up there in the first place as he has better things to do than live his life in the media spotlight and if you don't believe me I could spend weeks sending you shots of him with his mum and reems of information out there given by his mum.

All this crap about her not being proud of him is tosh. How often do you hear about the other 4 kids that she loves though. Point proven and please don't hang the disgusting lable of disabled child hater at my doorstep, Ive done more for disabled children than all of this forum put together, ok.

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544755)

Its hard to say until we see it as we dont know the whole story just yet

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7544762)

Ugh, hopkins is totally wrong here. While I kinda share her opinion that price is taking the pee slightly with her income and such taking handouts from the government...no way would I labour the point like this.

Originally Posted by Ellen (Post 7544766)

Thanks, i thought this had been shown on the ch 5 website and i had missed it. Will probably be shown tonight. :)

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544767)

Its not Katie that is taking handouts it is her son and he is very much entitled to it

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7544773)

She choses to take them, not him so I see it as her :shrug: Im not saying shes/hes not entitled to it as I said in the other thread..it just seems wrong when other disabled kids and such are getting their lives disrupted in the name of 'cuts' while millionaires are able to claim :S

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544763)

She always mentions every child but Harvey will always be special to her for obvious circumstances

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544752)

Neither did I , I simply stated facts and if you google Harvey, he is quite the little celebrity and a lovely lad. My point is he shouldn't be up there in the first place as he has better things to do than live his life in the media spotlight and if you don't believe me I could spend weeks sending you shots of him with his mum and reems of information out there given by his mum.

All this crap about her not being proud of him is tosh. How often do you hear about the other 4 kids that she loves though. Point proven and please don't hang the disgusting lable of disabled child hater at my doorstep, Ive done more for disabled children than all of this forum put together, ok.

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544778)

Sorry but bollocks.....Evidence teaches us that disabled children cant handle the media spotlight AT ALL and the best way to treat them IS BY TREATING THEM AS NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS.

They are not disabled or unfortunate, they are gods special children and they always flourish when treated normally. I hardly think that a photo shoot at her mansion with all his toys and gismos for all to see, is the right thing to do.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 7544780)

Calling her a bad mother is unfair and out of order imo when from what I've ever seen of her, she always does the best she can for him. I have no idea why you think I'm labeling you a disabled child hater when it was the mother of the child you were attacking, also I have no idea what relevance what you may or may not have done for charity has either

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544777)

She has and will continue to pay more tax then me, you or any other average working person in the UK so there for she should be allowed to take back out to help care for her son

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544793)

I think this is a load of BS beacuse she is caught by the paps out with her kids or she posts picture on social media there is no bloody need to call her a bad mother and i think some peoples attitude towards this stinks

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544794)

Where have I called her a bad mother and its a pity that you should say that doing anything for charity is wrong.....you see how things can be twisted, now its time to drop this thread as its getting personal and way off topic. \my fund raising acts are my business and up to my conscience.

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 7544782)

I wonder why she does not move nearer the school?

Originally Posted by erinp5 (Post 7544757)

Katie Price's mother has spoken out in the star's defence, after she sparked the ire of Katie Hopkins - and the public - when it was revealed she leans on taxpayers' money to care for her disabled son.

In an interview with The Sun, Amy Price, 62, has spoken of the difficulties her daughter faces in taking care of 12-year-old Harvey, whose daily taxi rides to school are paid for by the Government.

She said: 'It is so hurtful people can criticise my daughter for doing the best she can for Harvey. Katie Hopkins would never know how difficult having a disabled child can be.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...#ixzz3QEOcmkOX
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7544797)

Never said she wasnt allowed, I just take a dim view on people who take help when its not needed when others who do need the help are screwed over :shrug:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544808)

Because its a special school and she also has to think off the over kids as there might not be a school close by also she need more help then just taxi to school

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544823)

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544823)

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work