Callum would be nothing if it werent for Perez to argue with. AGAIN Perez demonstrates he is the centre of attention and the house.

Thought you would be pleased, your words are possibly coming true. Now you will have two favourites and you should be in the money....well done if they make it. I will be voting for them both KH and Callum.

Good for Calum

Cami took the nom's more to heart than anyone. Michelle would have had a strop and a half if she'd ever been nominated. I would have been hurt if 5 people nominated me constantly for no apparent reason. That's human.

He had a go at them because they were all talking about themselves and whether they were now in the final. Maybe you should rewatch. :shrug:

For what its worth mate, I find your posts interesting and I look forward to seeing you on here again for the next debacle, lol.

Betting odds dont seem to make alot of difference in deciding the winner.
Hope Kav and Michelle go tonight though

Not only has this Callum rise helped the show in regards to making the finale a four-horse race rather then three it is the way in which he has done so which I find the most appealing.

I would make the argument that about 80% of the support for Hopkins stems from her position as the anti-Perez candidate, but now as we've seen on the online clips Hopkins is now beginning to make amends with Perez and align, and whilst you may argue that it's done so the public can see Hopkins as "a changed woman who was nice all along" It's also taking away the reason for voting for her in the eyes of a lot of viewers. At the same time Calum is emerging as the anti-Perez candidate in her place and is garnering momentum from it, and as a result the anti-Perez vote is split in the same way that the anti-Hopkins vote is being split between Keith, Perez and to a lesser extent Pricey as well as slowing down Hopkins support.

As well as this there are punters to think about, I know people make jokes about betting syndicates but I do feel punters do sway the show a lot more in the modern era, taking long odds candidates and capitalising on momentum to bring about results which earn them much money, I felt it played a part in BB15 with Tamara, Matthew and Winston's boots as well as Hell-beast winning. Punters aren't going to find appeal in someone with short odds such as Hopkins or Keith, but a guy with an established support base due to being an attractive male who had long odds when the vote to win lines opened would be perfect.

Or maybe I'm just thinking too much

I know what you mean Jaxie. I think Keith is great and would love him to win too, if only there could be two winners. The reason I'm picking Katie is, whoever wins will get lots of press coverage and I think Katie Price will be a lot more vocal about the evil Katie Hopkins than Keith would be.

Can Calum sprint towards anything ?..................His new hair might fall off :hehe:

GO CALUM..GO CALUM. :dance2::dance2::dance2::dance2:

Me too mate, and you too Sam. kiisss

I agree with most of your posts but I don't really agree on the last point. She hasn't been very vocal a presence inside the house, why do you think that will change outside in relation to Hopkins? And also by the same token if she is going to be vocal about Hopkins she will get lots of press even if she doesn't win.

:his wig will fall off! :joker:

:dance::dance::dance::cheer::cheer::cheer:

Calum is actually a coward. He's more or less threatened to beat Perez up. And, again, he implied, if it weren't for Perez having the shield of CBB, Calum would have assaulted Perez.

This is of course the mark of a coward. Just like Hopkins - another coward - she picks her victims very carefully. Attacks Keith because 'he's easy game'.

Back to Calum, I wonder if this coward would threaten to punch Mike Tyson's lights out. Of course not. 'Cause Calum knows he'd have no teeth left.