The choir were ****ing boring and Old Men Grooving were not funny. It was a pretty deserving top two and I've never understood all the crying and wailing about 'dogs winning a human talent show!!!!!!'. It takes a human years to train a dog to do the things that Pudsey, Matisse and the others could do and more importantly why does it matter anyway? It's a variety entertainment show that is open to acts of any calibre, genre and age. Dog acts are not new and if people don't like the fact they're in the competition perhaps they should um...just watch something else.

I'm not even a massive dog lover and am more of a cat person but what a load of fuss over nothing

:clap1: :worship:

I'm still waiting for a dancing cat but i guess we won't see one :sad:

I'm sure adjoa could make any pussy dance.

:laugh2:

tbh would you rather another singer wins?

Here's your dancing Cat. :joker:

http://mtv.mtvnimages.com/uri/mgid:f...djuto1_250.gif

I've seen worse results happen on Talent shows before than this Dog winning BGT.

I mean just look at who won The Voice UK's last series.

The queen doesn't deserve to be put to sleep by the dull choir, the dog act was a great winner and was much deserved. Just because it involves animal training doesn't make it any easier nor less of an accomplishment.

But didn't you like Fleur East on the last X Factor UK series? And you liked Old Men Grooving and neither act was exactly talented, but just used Simon's stage productions to the fullest.

:clap1:
The choir sounded good but it was just plain imo
I didn't want the dog to finish the act i wanted more

I think the little Jessie was robbed and don't get me started on Henry

:laugh:

And I agree about the choir being boring, they even sung Hallelujah ffs.:facepalm:

Tbh BGT like all of the shows the best act should win, or one of them at least.