For be BB11 Qaud eviction as they knew it was Josie only chance to win

Came to say this. Really ground my gears that did.

Although her feeble 5th place finish did make up for it a little bit.

She was evicted unfairly though, to be honest. That vote should've been a vote to save. The people who liked Nikki had 10 other people to vote for, so the Nikki fans' votes would've been split between those 10 people. 64% wanted Nikki to stay.

Josie would've won over Corin, John James, Steve and Sam, though.

BB15: Killer nomination
BB15: Final pass
BB15: All male eviction (randomly saying this week is a girl power)
BB15: Safety app
BB15: Danielle eviction
BB15: Ashleigh going up when we voted for her to be a power housemate

CBB15: Perez randomly going to the secret house then having a poll if he is gonna be in final or he was gonna be nominated

BB16: Simon getting 2 weeks of immunity (he basically had immunity from 4 in 4 out)
BB16: Jack getting 3 weeks of immunity
BB16: Nick nominating before the house so house could gang on Sarah&Adjoa
BB16: Swapping noms in week 2 out of no where
BB16: 4 in 4 out (Hey you 6 congrats on getting 1 nomination or no nominations here is your prize 4 of you will be evicted)


In general: 1) Revealing nominations to the other housemates
2) Changing nomination rules every single week
3) Outside info (that is basically manipulating everything)

A general answer to the question how biased is the edit for the HL shows.How many are involved in deciding what is shown to us for 45mins each night.

I have often seen members on here asking for a return of or more of the live feed and even allowing for the silly bird noises I wonder if the reluctance is in part due to the producers then having less power to influence our vote.?

Spot on. The highlight shows are their only chance of swaying the votes to gain more ratings by keeping in entertaining housemates. Having a live feed gives them no power, and they like having the power.