I wish they would have tactically put Jack up against Danny and Chloe since Jack would be most likely to go out the three. Jack will no doubt be put up this week but he won't be going anywhere because Harry is up.

Even if Harry goes this week she's brought Marc and Nick down with her :clap1:

It's no sexism... it's because Harry and Jade have times they act like twats. If Jade and Harry acted like Chloe and Nick acted like Connor, all the hate would go to Nick.

Connor?

I like Harry and I think she gets a harder time than any other housemate.

She's been the most direct and upfront about herself and her motives yet she's vilified as this gameplaying skank.

They are both almost as bad as each other. Nick has shown himself to be a very weak very clingy housemate who cannot even function in there unless he has a woman attached to his hip. Harry has come in and paraded around naked and done ANYTHING to get attention. She made a bit of an effort with all the housemates in the beginning now she isn't even trying with the remaining girls. They can be evicted together for all I care. However of course St Nick is safe as Nikki fancies him !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yep she is being targeted that's for sure.

Yep totally agree with this.

:clap1:

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

Oh dear now I have heard everything and surly have to give up on mankind.

:clap1:

MANkind? Sexist

ps There's more sexism against men than women in western society

Nope. shes consistently lied about everything throughout , including her relationships and has cheated on her lover with this outrageous nonsense..and used a man for her own gain , totally faked having any feeling for him which is sick and cruel. especially as hes a young naïve virgin and its on tv 24/7...........and before the feminists start with their biased lies, I say the same regardless of gender. a cheat is a cheat a liar is a liar

screaming

No one should feel sorry for Harry.She is the one who admitted she pisses on men and allow men to piss on her for sexual gratification and money.What a vile woman.

Well I like Nick and Marc.
Don't take it seriously at all and can't stand Harry as a HM to look at either.
On the whole, most of the new HMs perceptions have been great too !
Guess it's not about sexism either - more about breaking up cosy groups.
But often feels far too much like a soap than reality TV.

End of this clip for example.
http://bigbrother.channel5.com/day-3...-anything-away

Marc brings up why they Nick and Harry don't kiss in public.
Good point !

Marc says
"Harry doesn't kiss Nick in public."
"No, Nick says they do, Nick says they did."
"Nick says 1 thing she says the opposite".

Er ok right.
So they don't kiss in public.
But Harry is wrong saying they don't either ?! :shrug:
Guess he's either a biased HM or a bad actor.
My guess is the latter.

Don't mind a bit of BB intervention to improve the group dynamic - it often needs it !
But even in the DR they said they thought Harry might be hurting Nick's chances of winning. (why do they care ?)

Marc also said he'd tell the ones who were doing great they weren't.
Next thing we see Helen telling Nick he isn't doing himself any favours.

Course it may all just be about new HM favouritism but feels too much like a soap opera.

Wtf... Harry meant she had a 'wife' which is a word for a 'good friend'. A lot of internet people use it as a term of endearment, not literally. I absolutely hated the way she was left on the sofa when everyone crowded around the new housemates. Please don't vote her out.

Consensually. It is not a reason to dislike someone because of what they find sexually pleasing. It is harmless when each party in the act of urination is in agreement. Urine is sterile. It doesn't hurt anyone. You are a misogynist.

Amy Poehler calls Rashida Jones her wife. Nick Kroll is Amy's boyfriend; Will Arnett is her ex-husband. She has never really been married to Rashida.

Wow, she has a "wife" and a boyfriend. Plus, she's a feminist. She believes females and males are equal. Disgusting person. :nono: :joker:

..yes but she's a skank...(I can't believe I typed that word...)...because she strips naked which of course is far worse than being mean and spiteful, just totally offensive to not cover up...(actually I do think that she should have more awareness of others with that and being in a group situation and wear more clothing when she's walking around and cooking etc..)...but it also doesn't really offend/it's just a naked body...so she's a skank, these are the rules...upfront and direct aren't important..she didn't even have the respect to us all of having surgery to her body first before she decided to strip off to make it more perky etc...but then if she had, she would have just been a 'plastic skank' and haven't we seen so many 'plastic skanks' before/nothing new to see there...thing is that she was a bit too upfront and direct to a liked housemate so she's a skank, don't ya know Macie Lightfoot...when will you learn, she's a skank....

..actually in all seriousness, have you noticed with Helen that her views on females and then her spite with those views are mainly based on that female in relation to their relationship/friendship to a male or males in the house but with males, she never does that...I mean she loves Marc..?...and that's fine, I think it was obvious that she would but where were the conversations telling him that she liked him but some of the things he had said to females were really not good and she had felt for them when he behaved like that...and with Nick...what the heck is going on with him, flip flopping around with Jade and then Harry etc....

What I'm finding interesting is that the forum is treating the legends like they are house mates again, judging their characters, calling them every adjective available in the English language. They are just there for a week as individuals, that are entitled to an opinion as much as anyone else. There will probably be 3 or 4 that will end up nominated for eviction, and then its up to the good old GBP as usual to decide, so what they do does't really affect anything. The best that can happen is that what "we" consider untouchable or boring characters may end up nominated. Apart from that its just a week of legend self promotion :laugh:

...yeah I don't disagree with what you say but them being there does hugely impact on the housemates though I think and to me it's just a manipulation too far in the same way as giving a finals pass was last year...I mean with Harry..?..I do think she would have been voted out anyway if she was nominated and Marc would have nominated her probably anyway if it was only him in the bunker...she would have been voted to evict for multiple reasons...her friendship with Nick which is deemed to be false/her nakedness/her conflict with Marc and by his fans etc/Nick's fans...but now added to all of that would be voted from fans of Helen/Nikki etc as well..(potentially..)..?...and I don't like the level of 'hate ' it could all build because these people have to come out of the house/have real lives and have 'served' BB by being housemates and don't deserve to have the public hate that BB is encouraging with this and with no care for them whatsoever...

Thats largely my feeling, Harry is not an original and is an easy target for nomination anyway, so she was high on the list of likely normal nominations. The method of her being nominated will likely have helped her cause no end, whether its enough to keep her there another week remains to be seen. If she survives this week, she will be gone the week after, so I very much hope that the GBP take the opportunity to boot a final coasting house mate out while they have the opportunity to do so