ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   Slick Vic Should Sue Helen For Slander (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281525)

jegmeister 20-06-2015 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7905468)
This. All Helen has to do is pick holes in his case. She doesnt have to prove anything even though she said it on TV.

You don't understand the law it seems. She has made the libellous comments so she must prove them or withdraw them.

bots 20-06-2015 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jegmeister (Post 7906307)
You don't understand the law it seems. She has made the libellous comments so she must prove them or withdraw them.

Not strictly true, you can say anything you like about someone provided it is factually correct. In this instance, Victor would be taking action against Helen, and would therefore have to prove that what she said was false

Beetlejuice 20-06-2015 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 7905327)
The fact that she has backtracked and said she knows no such thing really should strengthen his case somewhat.

Did she backtrack?

Rob! 20-06-2015 01:49 AM

@VicEbuwaSlick: Can somebody say - DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER �������� Thanks #bbHelen, you just spent your appearance fee on me ������������ #bbuk

Lampfan 20-06-2015 01:52 AM

I loved the slick.

He does what I'd expect.

Lister of Smeg 20-06-2015 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7906346)
@VicEbuwaSlick: Can somebody say - DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER �������� Thanks #bbHelen, you just spent your appearance fee on me ������������ #bbuk

:joker::dance:

reece(: 20-06-2015 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7905250)
As I said she never mentioned his name so he can't prove anything

It's on camera ffs :laugh:

Rob! 20-06-2015 03:04 AM

Perched for the Judge Rinder episode :flutter:

Colbert-Bump 20-06-2015 04:23 AM


JTM45 20-06-2015 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7905466)
A drugs test which with any type of drug found would be thrown out of court

Absolutely incorrect!:nono:

You cannot be found guilty of posession of a drug if it is found in your system (blood, urine or hair sample).

If they were testing him to determine whether he had cocaine in his system they could use a positive test to say he has recently used the drug but any other drug found in his system would be completely ignored as it's irrelevant to the case and, as i said earlier, it wouldn't be a crime anyway (unless he was driving at the time).

She was obviously talking about Victor in the initial comment which she even confirmed when they called her into the diary room. Even if she hadn't confirmed it in the DR even the most basic prosecutor could convince a Judge/Jury who she was refering to.

If he really wants to do it he'd have an excellent case (unless there's prior documented evidence, which is unlikely).

Rorkimaru 20-06-2015 10:17 AM

Did she say he dealt or that he was a cokehead? Like if the onus is on him to prove that he has never taken cocaine that'll be a difficult thing to do.

billy123 20-06-2015 10:26 AM

How do you still not see. http://ukvapers.org/images/smilies/Pack1/smiley26.gif
IT ISNT REAL IT IS AN ENTERTAINMENT SHOW SET IN A TV STUDIO.

Kazanne 20-06-2015 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7905384)
He is :joker: check his Twitter :hehe:

All mouth me thinks,Victors as dodgy as they come:hehe:

ebandit 20-06-2015 10:39 AM

........helen should be made to share her stash................

but seriously who gives a **** what helen says............i would not give a ****

if she were to ***

Mark L

karezza 20-06-2015 10:43 AM

This was Big Brother's revenge on Victor.

little.lilly 20-06-2015 11:39 AM

It's the show that should be sued for airing it. The HM's probably say a lot of things they shouldn't. It's the productions teams jobs to edit it out.

kistar 20-06-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JTM45 (Post 7906417)
Absolutely incorrect!:nono:

You cannot be found guilty of posession of a drug if it is found in your system (blood, urine or hair sample).

If they were testing him to determine whether he had cocaine in his system they could use a positive test to say he has recently used the drug but any other drug found in his system would be completely ignored as it's irrelevant to the case and, as i said earlier, it wouldn't be a crime anyway (unless he was driving at the time).

She was obviously talking about Victor in the initial comment which she even confirmed when they called her into the diary room. Even if she hadn't confirmed it in the DR even the most basic prosecutor could convince a Judge/Jury who she was refering to.

If he really wants to do it he'd have an excellent case (unless there's prior documented evidence, which is unlikely).


So hope he takes it all the way.:joker:

Chuckyegg 20-06-2015 11:55 AM

Cokeheads are unbearable and gobby. Victor is neither of those. pffffffff

smudgie 20-06-2015 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice (Post 7906343)
Did she backtrack?

APparently, according to Emma we will see it on tonight's show.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.