:clap1::clap1:

He knows what he is doing. He thinks the Helen way of last year is the way to go. But the pillock does not have a final pass and has not been up for eviction.

Can't wait for him to be up in a VTE. Bye bye.

Marc did not deserve that warning. If he did why didn't Brian receive one after becoming threatening and quite violently aggressive during most of his rows? Of course we all know that Saint Brian Bellend can do no wrong can he. As seen on BOTS tonight - a disgustingly bias programme.

He may have done? The warning was given in the morning, we'll probably never know. But I don't know what Brian said that could have caused offence to the housemates or the public? This was the rule which Marc clearly broke but I can't remember Brian breaking it.

In most of Brian's outbursts he overreacts and uses very threatening posturing to the extent he has to be held back each time. To me that's far worse than being called psycho. Brian simply cannot do wrong in some eyes can he.

From past BB's (I'm just using this is a broad example), they could have given him a warning for his aggressive manner and demeanour. If a housemate had of complained that they felt uneasy they could complain to BB.

Now that's just a general one I can think of and it would be worded differently but you get the idea.

Well thats my point exactly (by the way, its weird that you found fault in Brian but not Marc when it was clear who was worse) Marc could have caused offence to the public and got reprimanded for it and rightly so, if Big Brother felt as if Brians behaviour could have intimidated other housemates then he probably would have been given the same punishment, but we'll probably never know.

Well you asked what Brian could be done for breaking rules. Hence why I posted about him. You asked about Brian I answered, so don't go in like I'm nitpicking.

I never knew taking off shoes could be intimidating before Brian Bello graced my screen. The dude was a manipulative aggressive dick who had flawless timing when it came to retreating into the sweet innocent act. He played harder than any other housemate in there.

yeah, he called Brian a psycho. Helen didn't make him say that, he's an asshole and a ****ing bully, he fakes "care" but occasionally, his true personality rears its ugly head (like how he claims he didn't get Jade evicted by staying out of it, when by staying out of it he effectively gave majority vote to nominate her, and not staying out of it would have saved her, filthy scum)

although I have to say, him yelling "that's what I have, a brain, a brain you ****ing dumbass" was hilarious cause Brian spilled such gorgeous word asphalt over him, and he was gasping unable to come up with any sort of response, it was so beautiful. Cause Brian is regarded as dumbass, where he's not dumb a all, in face is very intelligent, and sure, during his BB stint, he was severely under-educated, but has clearly worked on it over the years, and the "scientist" Marc can't even see it, (with all his education he can't tell that radioactive particles aren't chemical elements (referring to his tattoo) and has 0 ability to read other people, which most well educated people learn over the years if not born with - not him).

No wonder he was on Brian's back all this time. There's not a single trait that makes him even equal to Brian, Brian looks like god compared to him, Brian is funny where he's just insulting, Brian is loved where he's puke inducing, Brian is clearly intellectual giant compared to him and despite complete lack of formal education, unlike him Brian doesn't kick him self in the mouth but constantly saying incorrect things.

Marc should be sterilized, creatures like him shouldn't be allowed to procreate and pollute the gene pool.

Oh yeah, well the original post which you did 'nit pick' apart :hee: was a post which I asked about the language, I see where you went wrong now.

It looks like we agree though? You realise how Marc calling someone a psycho is worth a reprimand? Because its an obvious rule break which could cause offense to viewers, similarly to Brians arguably aggressive behaviour which you also saw tonight.

I didn't go 'wrong' anywhere, I merely answered the question which you asked about not knowing something about BRIAN (just thought I'd put that in capitals as you keep changing the subject to MARC, now BRIAN and MARC are two different housemates, I find a good way to distinguish between them is that one is black and one is white).

I can be sarcastic too.

And I only pointed out that if you saw fault in Brian then you must have seen fault in Marc, otherwise you would have watched the show with some sort of bias or rose-tinted glasses..

Marcs offence was clear, in writing, he called a man a psycho, could have cause offence to the viewers and should have been reprimanded.
Brians offence of being too aggressive is only arguable. If you saw fault in Brian you must have seen fault in Marc.

Can't be bothered to capitalise what I feel like you're struggling with because I'm over talking about this with you. If your saw fault in Brian and not Marc then your watching the show as a biased viewer and a biased opinion means so little to me.

:wavey:

Yeah, they never officially warned him in the DR.

No.

Exactly and not only did he throw his hideous temper around at Helen but he also kept doing it to Marc who was just trying to be civil with the git.

I don't think he deserved one tonight but has done in the passed

Yes it was right BB pulled him up on his behaviour, they should have done before now as well.

I believe he did, yes. Marc is enabling Helen and the two of them are not pretty to watch. I like Brian but seems clear to me he has a pretty low IQ and goading and picking on him as they have been doing is reprehensible. He was clearly struggling to cope while trying to stand up to them. It was like watching some sort of vile bear bating by two vicious dogs. If someone treated me the way they have Brian I'd be pretty angry too.

Brian, like the rest of us, is entitled to have a temper and to loose it when provoked. Marc wasn't in any way civil, he was doing what most bullies gangs do, backing the vile leader.

Any defence of Helen's behaviour is frankly delusional and its quite scary to think that there are people on here who would condone that.

He didn't deserve a warning tonight imo, but he has deserved warnings in the past for his behaviour, it makes a mockery of the warning system.

He deserved it for instigating yet another row the question was about nikki nothing to do with brian ...he goaded him intentionally.

What a pathetic warning, I've never seen anything so stupid

He deserved a different warning before Helen even entered the house but the Brian and Helen thing really has nothing to do with him.

NO...Peoples views are sooo twisted..

For those saying yes..please provide specific examples from last night to back up your point..

C5 is just covering there ass in case Brian takes actions