I believe her and they never warned him for his aggressive temper in the main house. Also if they never showed it on TV then they probably had no need to warn him.

What the viewers can't see can't distress them.

I was just about to mention this.

Why would Helen lie and risk court action when it's all been captured on camera?

Surely, there's some truth in this. We already saw how weird he was behaving in the bunker, so stripping down and doing the "duck" wouldn't surprise me at all. lol

well he hasn't denied it..and if he doesn't that is proof enough for me..not mention there where cameras and 2 others witnesses ...do you honestly think with cameras and wittiness she would make up?

It was a sarcastic comment. Helen is FAR from a prude. That's the whole point.
Why is she suddenly playing the "I'm a virgin & have never even seen a naked man" card now ?.
If Marc had decided, yet again, to cover his private parts in foil & parade in front of her I doubt Helen would have been offended.

It was Brians weird behaviour that freaked her out.
...and there's a difference between someone covering their private parts with tin foil and another being completely naked with their balls and arse on full view.

Shes not? Shes saying it freaked her out. I have seen naked men before, in random situations (such as in a pub :umm2: ) but having someone strip off and lie on the floor and say they are a frozen chicken or whatever..I would be pretty weirded out by that. As would most people I assume D:

Nasty piece of work is Helen and that rag is giving her licence to continue turning tricks. :yuk:

And I'm sure if Marc had done this then Marc supporters would be laughing their backsides off saying what a funny man he is (!).
I can hear a huge barrel being scraped when trying to justify Helen's behaviour in that house.
Does ANYTHING Brian did deserve being called a rapist & a murderer ?.
She should have been removed from the house as soon as she said it but true to form Helen & Marc supporters are blaming the victims of their vile behaviour.
NOTHING excuses what she said.
IF Brian had said this to Marc their would have been outrage from his supporters.
And I would have also said that Brian should have been removed.
But some on here can only see wrong in others & defend Helen & Marc regardless.
IF Helen was so offended by Brian's actions then she had the option of walking out.

Not reading she's tragic

Nope, never said it means he deserved to be called that and have condemned that since it happened :shrug:

Helen sorta makes a point of not going crying to the diaryroom complaining so maybe she felt like she would be a hypocrite if she did?
I have no doubt that if this happened and if she HAD complained to BB that Brian WOULD have gotten a warning and been told to tone down the nudity/odd behaviour in other's personal space or whatever.
As it stands I don't think Helen is a prude I think she just felt Brian was a creepy weirdo that she felt weirded out by but not necessary unsafe because she knew the cameras were there.
Her and Marc also both seemed to be baffled at Brian's explosions of temper in all the rows in the days before that final row. They both seemed to think he was a "psycho" or unhinged they way he would just explode.

She knows it doesn't justify the names she called him and said she could retract those two words if she could and she does clarify that he is NOT either of those things she called him, she just seems to be giving a backstory to explain the build up of things and why that argument went the way it did, even though it of course doesn't excuse the actual words she used.

http://bigbrother.channel5.com/day-3...r-attack-house

Frozen duck clip here.

But some on here are trying desperately to search for reasons to defend Helen & make Brian into some kind of sexual predator.
I honestly don't think Brian would want Helen.

The clip is there and it did happen so call her a liar now.

The clip is there with Marc on about it so yeah he is a weirdo and a creep.

But if Helen was weirded out but not threatened by his behaviour then it's a non-story. She has nothing better to say than slate somebody that she has deeply offended in order to gain backing for her behaviour in that house.
Aaron was removed for his behaviour with Joel so Helen knew BB would have to take action if needs-be but instead she waits to weeks to tell it in a newspaper for maximum publicity.
I just don't believe her :shrug:

So your saying it never happened when that clips proves that it did. She was weirded it by it and explains why she thought he was an odd ball.

But I don't believe Helen was offended or creeped out by it.
Any normal person would remove themselves from a situation where they felt like this NOT wait two weeks & tell it to a newspaper.

She was weirded out but probably felt safer because Marc and Nikki were there. She's being called vile for her comments so she's only revealing her side of things.

He has a very weird/different side to what BB fans have seen. Helen never denied her actions, but she has a right to let others know that he is an odd character. His temper was over the top.


Sorry but if someone did that randomly I would be a little weirded out.

So nobody gave a flying fig about that clip at the time but now yoyo knickers has decided to try and use it to try and excuse her own behaviour people suddenly make it out to be a big deal.
Talk about desperate.

Im done the desperation is just too much.

No, it was used because she was called an apparent liar, but there's the evidence and it was a quick clip.

Thank goodness we never had to endure the full thing like poor Helen.

You believe her, I don't. We will never agree.
All I know is that if Helen & Brian were stuck in a room alone together, I would fear much more for Brian's safety & not "Poor defenceless" Helen.

I guess we wont know the truth till Marc comes out.

Well the proof he did it was in the clip. If he's doing pervy things like that and giving her creepy eyeballs like he did in the final row they had it's a no wonder she views him a perv.

She's such a strong character and tells it how it is, so why on earth would she be freaked out by a naked man? I don't buy it. Seems she's just trying to say all the right things to justify her appalling behaviour.