Judging housemates on their actions outside has always happened though, back in its hey day the Sunday papers were full of kiss and tell type stories of what housemates had done in the past, now HMs just get in there first with the stories to make themselves seem outrageous.

But it has something to do with it. Chloe is trying desperately to come across as a nice, sweet homebody who just wants the money to settle down etc., when in reality she's a nasty, vindictive cow, with very little in the 'nice' department.
Her mate the weazel comes under the same category. Trying hard to be the 'local hero' when in reality he also is nasty, vicious, aggressive and downright weazely.
To make a viable decision about someone it's necessary to know all about someone, the good and the downright nasty.

I keep thinking about that poor taxi driver. Bad enough to have to drive drunken chavs for a living, but then having to clean up their vomit AND convince the police that he wasn't a kidnapper must have been a nightmare for him.

I did not see your post but if you can glean this info then it will also be there for others to find and presumably the BB research staff did prior to picking Chloe as a HM.(Assuming Chloe did not inform them).

Every series on this forum members find and reveal the lies and less savoury aspects of some HMs past which can cause some anger or disillusionment when compared to the image they are attempting to project in the house.

I now wonder if this is the effect the producers wish.? Should this be seen as part of the game or a sorry state of affairs. I am not sure.?

This story was part of Chloes BB introduction interview, we posted it along with the other housemates info on Launch night. So she brought it into BB by herself with her finding it oh so hilarious.

agreed, absolutely horrific situation for an honest hard working man to be in....she went to jail but it should have been for a year

Ive read all these posts and on the one hand people are saying these contestants can bring scammer identities and back stories to the table and if they get through the net then fine, but are we expected as normal people, to simply disregard the fact that someone has slipped through the net with a scammer backstory and treat them with respect based on what they do on the show.

Sorry but the definition of a conman is someone who is generally believable until the dirty deed is done and I for one, don't like being conned. If all you watch this show for is blood, guts and thunder, then fine, but some of us like to see fun, interaction, arguments and good clean storylines with a bit of spice thrown in, not the likes of slimy characters like Danny, Chloe and Joel with Nick and harry on the fringe of cringe and scam.

shes clearly a nasty piece of work, her whole innocent sensitive poor me schtick is a lie throughout. shes utterly selfish and fake and her best mate was evil Helen wood ?now were seeing the real chloe and its very very unpleasant.

Makes me love Chloe even more. Would love to go on a night out with her!

yes it be great spewing all over a taxi , avoiding the bill, ringing 999 making serious false accusations against innocent hard working men, getting locked up in jail and getting a criminal record that will be held against you for decades and damage your career and reputation....yes sounds fantastic enjoy yourself

Not long to wait until this Friday then.

Don't put your hand in the puke:laugh:

in addition to trying to get an innocent working man imprisoned and losing his license, some one else may have been getting mugged robbed raped or killed while she was wasting emergency police time

Seems to be a lot of jealousy to "The Chloster".

It's got to be jealousy because she's been nothing but a pleasant girl throughout the series.

I think you are right here.

Those good looks, slim body, wealth, fame, class. How could we not envy her?:laugh:

I absolutely agree. I don't understand how anyone has the gall to try and tell us the criteria we should use to cast our own personal votes.

All it does is make me throw a few more eviction votes chloe's way.

Jack does have an history for it. I have learned to take it with a pinch of salt.

Yep I think the ignore list is probably my friend on this occasion.

Please do, I desperately want Chloe evicted. She's a useless bore.

http://media.tumblr.com/9c4cb7d7f934...enp1rldwd0.gif

But to be fair to Jack. Quite a few of his posts are articulate and spot on. Just that some are not.

Like everybody on this forum really. Which is why i like it at BB time!

(after having that gif bookmarked for two years I've finally got to use it twice in one day :cheer2:)

Keep it handy. You could yet get a hat-trick:laugh:

She's been young and stupid... and drunk. Not justifying her actions but they don't make her a bad person, she's just made bad decisions. I think it's more important to look at if someone has learned anything from their actions and changed rather than just condemn them for it. Doing a bad thing doesn't make you a bad person. I'm sure most of us have done things that we would be judged negatively for but that don't define who we really are.

I don't care how good his posts are usually. He needs to stop telling others how to vote.

She refused to condemn Helen. Ergo, a scumbag.