ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   Jack Paid £4000 for football scores? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=284318)

Babayaro. 09-07-2015 08:34 AM

I don't think he'd want to know the scores tbh. Plymouth missed out on a play-off spot by 1 point :joker:

Ashley. 09-07-2015 09:42 AM

Chloe is a beaut <3

She's obviously gathered that nobody is listening to her about not taking the money so she thought she'd join in. If Jack, Nick and Joel aren't selfish, then neither is she. :clap2:

Pete. 09-07-2015 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 7979725)
again, you are making value judgements based on its worth to you. You are not jack. What is important to him, should be given equal standing as anything Chloe decides is of value.

You're not Jack either so you don't know where he stands with Chloe

Pete. 09-07-2015 12:03 PM

Have people conveniently forgotten that Chloe asked Jacks dad for the football results for free?

bots 09-07-2015 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petemitch (Post 7980229)
You're not Jack either so you don't know where he stands with Chloe

i never said i was

MrWong 09-07-2015 12:27 PM

Not Chloe trying to justify taking 5k by bringing up that Jack nearly spent 4k.

Cherie 09-07-2015 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petemitch (Post 7980232)
Have people conveniently forgotten that Chloe asked Jacks dad for the football results for free?

Jack asked her to ask for them, and he didn't know his Dad was going to ring in the show so i don't really get the point of this argument?

mimosveta 09-07-2015 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7979498)
Another bad woman player bites the dust. Still, take solace all feminists. We have had Kate Lawler, Nadia Almada?, Rachel Rice, Sophie Reade, Josie Gibson and Helen Wood as winners. Not as bad a ratio as you think!

You know, I'd rather have 5 worthy people as finalists than 5 women. But I'm not getting either, so I'm pissed.

Then again, real comfort to feminists is that out of all male housemates, not one was a decent person. Girls at least had Sarah, Jade, Sam and Harry, maybe even Adjoa (she was in for far too short to tell, I didn't enjoy her being christian, but I liked how she creeped everyone out talking about poosey :)

Real solace to feminists is that these girls weren't backstabbing mess, if girls have fixed their attitude towards other women, half a fight is done. Chloe being disloyal is hardly a dent compared what those men in there are like. :shrug:

erinp5 09-07-2015 12:43 PM

No he made the offer to BB but Chloe guilt tripped him and he withdrew it ...Just as well... as she then took 5k .

downthechippie 09-07-2015 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 7979704)
..yeah, this is it for me as well Amy and why not all of their 'offers' have been the same ...did he get the score btw..?...I would have been evil BB and given him some old/last year's score and said, oh I never said recent ones/ha 2....(sorry for the rush/work..)....

The way I see it is that BB can take away from the prize fund (because Chloe and Sam were talking when they were told not to), and some housemates were making really stupid purchases (Joel with the £2,500 pizza, Jack speculated about spending £4000 on football results, but decided not to). Spending £100 on a suitcase.

Now these purchases and BB taking away from the prize fund are all REPLACEABLE. The housemates are given opportunities to top up the prize fund to the original £150,000.

BUT. Chloe's £5000 (and anyone else who takes cash to spend OUTSIDE the house) will ALWAYS be taken into account, so the prize fund will only reach £145,000.

So I believe that anything spent in the house can be replaced. Any cash to be collected on the OUTSIDE will not be replaced.

That's what I think happens in these situations.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this stuff happen in previous years, and didn't BB always get the prize fund topped up, even though stupid things were bought in the house?

jaxie 09-07-2015 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Firegazer (Post 7979880)
Chloe is a beaut <3

She's obviously gathered that nobody is listening to her about not taking the money so she thought she'd join in. If Jack, Nick and Joel aren't selfish, then neither is she. :clap2:

They are selfish by Chloe's own standards. Exactly why she is a hypocrite.

downthechippie 09-07-2015 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 7979734)
Jack knew he was wasting 4k there was little gain for himself a football result a £1 drink and a "Cheap" Blazer.Chloe took 5k of real money that's the significant difference imo.

Jack acted in the spirit of the game but Chloe was calculating and clinical.

Even if he had not back tracked and cancelled it I still think that the majority of viewers would have found in his favour.

That's just it - In the spirit of the game. Stupid purchases such as the £2,500 pizza, Joel. Losing almost ONE HuNDRED GRAND for talking during a task. All of these are IN THE SPIRIT OF THE GAME.

Take £5,000 hard cash to be spent OUTSIDE the house is a completely different thing.

I don't blame Chloe for taking it. I just don't like the little madam because she is a disloyal, cowardly sneak.

vafunghoul 09-07-2015 01:41 PM

Jack is a degenerate gambler. Chloe may just be a degenerate.

abhorson 09-07-2015 01:44 PM

After tonights show goes out. Chloe will be odds on to be evicted. Harry will be safe.

Win, win, either way.

jaxie 09-07-2015 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by downthechippie (Post 7980442)
The way I see it is that BB can take away from the prize fund (because Chloe and Sam were talking when they were told not to), and some housemates were making really stupid purchases (Joel with the £2,500 pizza, Jack speculated about spending £4000 on football results, but decided not to). Spending £100 on a suitcase.

Now these purchases and BB taking away from the prize fund are all REPLACEABLE. The housemates are given opportunities to top up the prize fund to the original £150,000.

BUT. Chloe's £5000 (and anyone else who takes cash to spend OUTSIDE the house) will ALWAYS be taken into account, so the prize fund will only reach £145,000.

So I believe that anything spent in the house can be replaced. Any cash to be collected on the OUTSIDE will not be replaced.

That's what I think happens in these situations.

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't this stuff happen in previous years, and didn't BB always get the prize fund topped up, even though stupid things were bought in the house?

I would agree with you.

jaxie 09-07-2015 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7980464)
After tonights show goes out. Chloe will be odds on to be evicted. Harry will be safe.

Win, win, either way.

I think Harry took the cash too so she might be heading for some fallout too. She has also been calling others selfish.

sampvt 09-07-2015 02:01 PM

You all seem to be missing the point, the 2.5k for pizza and even the 4k for footie scores are make believe sums that fluctuate up and down but will always end up at the top figure of 150k. The 5k in little miss skanky gob, stays in her bank to be used for chavvy purposes no doubt, or maybe lent to her family to fund more drug runs, who knows.

One thing is for sure, it aint going anywhere but down her neck or into someone elses pocket so she can play chav. Its gone from the prize fund for ever. Joels 2.5k will be earned back by some inane scheme provided by BB.

abhorson 09-07-2015 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7980471)
I think Harry took the cash too so she might be heading for some fallout too. She has also been calling others selfish.

Ah. not seen that. After what she said too!! Both devious bastards.

Ashley. 09-07-2015 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7980675)
Ah. not seen that. After what she said too!! Both devious bastards.

Before you jump to conclusions, Harry didn't take the money, she put it back in the prize fund.

Pete. 09-07-2015 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 7980310)
Jack asked her to ask for them, and he didn't know his Dad was going to ring in the show so i don't really get the point of this argument?

No Chloe asked off her own back


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.