![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
She stuffs her face with pizza in front of them, sneering at them as she eats. She tells Jack's dad 'He can't come to the phone', when she KNOWS his sack held zero cash. She is all pally with Jack when she thinks the public like him, but turns totally against him when she thinks the public don't like him. She throws a tantrum and cries if anyone dares to nominate her - hence why nobody has dared to nominate her since. And as for the others spending some of the prize money on stupid things like Joel with the Pizza, as Joel TRIED to point out, BB would give them opportunities to refill the prize money if it was spent on 'silly luxuries'. But TAKING £5000 cash to be spent OUTSIDE of the house is an entirely different animal. That money will not be topped up. So we can't compare Joel's £2,500 pizza with Chloe's Cash grab. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't have a problem with any of them taking anything tbh. Good on Chloe for taking the 5k. However my problem is with her nonestop whingeing about others doing it...having a ****fit for the sake of 100 quid last night FGS..then doing the exact same thing herself.It matters not if its taking away from the prize fund or keeping an offer for yourself and refusing to add to it really, its the same thing and I'm not sure why its being made out to be completely different. Poor 'Danny' (we all know she does not really mean Danny when she goes off on one ;) ) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
agree ^ It wasn't her money, it was a test like everything else, it's money that was only given to her because of the add to/subtract from cashbombs involving the Prizefund
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's far more sexist to claim someone will be evicted because they are a woman than to judge people on their actions regardless of gender, race or colour. |
The £5000 was originally part of the total prize for the winner of £150,000 but was removed at the beginning of the twist as punishment for people talking. She had the opportunity to add it back to the fund, or take it for herself. It would only really be "her money to give" if the housemates had successfully raised the prize back up to the original £150,000, and the £5000 was an additional extra that could raise the fund to higher than this. I totally don't blame her, most people - including me - would've done the same, but t definitely does make her look a bit silly after the fuss she's made all week about any money being taken away from what the winner deserves.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know, Jack who she allowed to spend 4 hours or so standing, encouraged to miss a call from his father..etc...while knowing he was adding nothing... |
I think it just depends on the way you view it.
The people who were offered money I don't see it as being really their money. They are being offered money for a chance to give them the option of rebuilding the prize fund for the eventual winner. It's not like the prize fund is still intact and this is just an extra 5000 they are offering to certain people with the option to keep it or add to prize fund. No matter what way it was worded by BB, Chloe was given the option to basically return 5000 to the prize fund that she contributed (amongst others) to dropping in the first place or else to pocket it for herself and she chose to pocket it. This does lessen the overall prize fund so in a slightly more indirect way perhaps than Jack/Joel, is still 'taking away' from a figure that could very easily have been higher for the winner if she just said a simple no. I know it's not 'taking away' from the current prize fund figure on the plasma screen but imo the money on offer to each of them is just part of the original prizefund anyways that they are meant to be trying to rebuild. I don't see it as just some extra treat or prize that is being offered, it's part of the money that they helped to lose and supposedly want to regain again for the sake of the winner. She goes on and on about how everybody should want the winner to have as big a prize fund as is possible but doesn't apply that reasoning to her own actions. That is why she is a hypocrite. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As others have said. Joel, Jack, and Nick never actually took any cash home. They were doing it for the game. And all knew that the cash would go back up. They all did it for a reason. Chloe took cold hard cash.
Chloe after four days of slating others, took cash home. If any one fails to see the hypocrisy, then well... |
Given the chance, I and anyone else would had taken the money. She's a hypocrite for getting mad at Jack about how selfish he was for depleting the prize fund and now she basically did the same thing. Chloe fans probably won't see the hypocrisy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course, I don't have an issue with her choice, I'd have done the same. But then, I wouldn't have spent the past week being all high-and-mighty about it either. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.