![]() |
Four in four out.
I really liked Kieran and was warming to the Twins, when they were cruelly axed. |
I liked every twist. ...they were real head f-ck twists. ...shame we didnt have a house full of marcs and jades to do them. ....bb tried so hard to inject some life into those house mates but just like so many of the voters, they didnt understand the actual premis of the show
|
Brilliant twists aren't enough ....brilliant house mates are the essential ingredient. ..The twists were good ...esp the money ones
|
4 in 4 out. It just completely changed the series in completely the wrong ways.
|
They are not even in same boat so i dunno why people are trying to quantify them as such. 4 out 4 in was voted by the public and done legit as big brother states.
Sam's eviction was a total joke. Not to mention a 100% fix that BB knew it would be Sam regardless of what was gonna happen. If Chloe had 50k and Sam 1p she would still of gone. The Clique had the outvote power regardless. It was totally unfair and against BB without being voted for by the public. |
Sam's eviction.
"You Decide!" ...Not anymore... |
Quote:
BB had to twist it that week because the housemates had put all the good game players up for eviction AGAIN and saved all the ones who were playing it safer I can't be sure after so long, but i think we stood to lose Jade, Aaron, Eileen, Nick, Joel, Jack and Christian...3 of the housemates a lot of people are now listing in their ideal top 5 and 4 of the housemates we have all put in the final.. I think BB moved fast and were effective in diverting an even worse show than people are complaining about now Ironically the only 2 finalists not in that original power gang are Danny and Chloe which for me, explains a lot....a reminder of how little they were giving us before Marc arrived |
4in4out just downright ruined it.
|
Quote:
If you don't think its acceptable then why are you still here...watching, discussing. moaning....? BB are the gaffer, they have to be played the same as the other house mates and the public have to be played...the remaining house mates have played all 3 of those opponents better than anyone else and thats why they are the finalists...if BB decided to eject Sam then its because she wasn't a good enough game player...simple...i don't believe all this ''its a fix'' sour grapes but if it was a fix then why didn't they pick Chloe or Danny or joel etc...the answer is because they have been better game players than Sam God knows BB have to have some involvement in steering the show...the voters are total morons a lot of them..last time BB left it totally up to the public we had the dreaded BB 4....Is that what you would prefer ? Sam only lasted so long because Marc took a shine to her ..she bathed in his glory...she hasn't worked at all to deserve a place in the final...and sometimes if you don't work hard enough you get the sack |
Quote:
And Marc is literally one of the most overrated housemates ever. Plus he would have been going in at some point so I don't see how it makes a difference. |
both, but 4in4out just murdered this series. The most awful twist they could ever come up with.
|
Both. But especially Sam getting evicted as the public didn't get a say in it
|
Quote:
Might as well just watch Loose Women. All this men vs women rubbish....its not 1946.... |
4 in 4 out as it ruined the series for me
|
Sam by far. One of my two remaining favourites had only just been evicted and then out of the blue they go and rub it in with one of the most unfair of **** twists in the big brother history books.
Loved the 4 out/4 in twist though, but would've loved it a lot more if it had just been 2 out (ideal choice being Chloe and Danny)/4 in. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.