user104658 |
29-07-2015 11:49 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia
(Post 8031753)
You know, you could have had a wealth of letters after your name too. It's not my fault you haven't.
|
I'm not jealous of you Livia? Are you bragging? I'm not sure what you think is going on here, but it wasn't me getting uppity about someone "questioning my intelligence". I'm quite secure without the letters, frankly.
Quote:
1) You said "we live in a society that personifies animals and dehumanises foreigners". You didn't refer to "part" of that society, you referred to society itself.
|
That would surely suggest "society at large", a majority (or, "most"?) or the general status quo. Again it in no way infers that I think anything at all about "everyone" or being unique in my thinking. There are people on this tiny forum who roughly share many of my opinions so I would assume that there might be a few more globally :shrug:.
Touche... That's an even worse name for a lake than it is for a lion, though.
Quote:
3) Still waiting for someone to tell me regarding these unfortunate faceless (not nameless, they all have names) tide of immigrants at Calais... how many "safe" countries did they pass through to get to Calais and why do they want to come here?
|
If they all have names then why are they rarely if ever named by the press? You can argue "names unknown" but, being realistic, let's not pretend that the journalists (or the readers) have made or are even vaguely interested in making any attempt to find out those names.
I'm also not sure why them having passed through other safe countries to come here is relevant, in any way, to whether or not they deserve to die.
I think you also want the answer to be "benefits" but that is in fact not the answer at all, it's much more commonly because Britain has an absolutely thriving off-the-books shadow economy where these people can find work (often for less than half of minimum wage) and can stay off the radar. A shadow economy that is growing rapidly thanks to Tory cuts, actually.
|