So she's a coward for not punching her?

I meant she is a coward for WANTING to punch Farrah.

All mouth is Nat. She thinks by saying she wants to punch someone is a good thing.

My point is we don't go round punching people. I've never punched anyone inb my life and I am 33 years old.

We created this monster, now we want it destroyed. Stop pretending you're not entertained.

Oh I like Housemates breaking the rules, I don't like it when production break their own rules though.

natasha is really ugly, since she took her make up off her face is so flat and pale and unattractive. It really does look like she was hit in the face with a shovel covered in grey dust.

She pretends to be a bitchy diva, except when the americans are around, then she shuts up, because she has already been put in her place so many times by them already.

If she was in the house with just brits and no americans, she would be just as nasty as farrah. that's the imperession i get.

No Way
it was a private chat in the DR.


I love her Passion

She looks great
Sexy

no, she looks like an asian woman that dipped her face in acid. she looks like her whole face is slightly caved in, and then bleached, and then just the hint of eyes, a nose, and mouth peak through the neutral mess that was left. she's hideous.

She is playing Tash actively seeking this type of response.Tash is very aware of this but everyone has a point when they cannot take anymore.I just posted on another thread is she using Perez Hilton as a role model.That very decent black guy walked rather than make a violent threat or worse against Perez.

the very decent black guy that was a total homophobe and a crack head you mean?

If Daniel can say: "When we get the chance we'll cut her ****ing throat" and not get a warning, I highly doubt Natasha saying she wants to punch someone will get any notice :laugh:

The rules always get bent around with CBB anyway. If this was said on a civilian series they'd get a massive warning and probably be ejected...

I want to punch Farrah. I totally understand where Natasha's coming from. She's a horrible, ignorant, rude human being.

I watched quite a bit of the show online last week with an American. He wasn't happy with the calibre of Americans they've sent us. They're about on a par with the British though... all useless gob****es. Except Scoop... seems he's the only one with any manners.

It's all double standards depending on who is popular and who isn't.

A main example I can think of is the difference between the reaction to Conor's epilator comment and Liz Jones' stabbing comment.

I'm guessing Natasha didn't get a warning because it was in the diary room where she was just venting her anger, rather than being seen as a threat. I still don't think it's right that she gets away with it though, the same as Farrah's spit and water bottle comments.

I would be cracking up laughing at her if I were there, she's so funny, like bobby said people can only rile you if you allow it.

I would quite happily take a warning if I could slap the little runt.:joker:

I was thinking that someone would want to punch her and Natasha said it.

to be fair, natasha is the one that started in on farrah on the first night...

This

So she should

Context is always important, and in this case she was airing her annoyance, it wasn't a threat. Words on their own mean nothing. For example, you could easily say, I love you, with a knife in your hand ready to stab someone

I can't quote it word for word, but Farrah said something similar (wanting to hit her with a bottle I think) on that first night.

I think a lot of people feel like punching Farrah and Farrah has said a lot worse and got away with it,she may get a warning yet anyway.

Most people say they want to punch/slap/hit someone but does anyone mean it? no.. and she said it in the diary room... it would have been bad if she said it to a housemates face but she didn't.

Well, there was a difference between the reaction because the situations were entirely different. There's a difference between having a wild, unprovoked rant in which you threaten violence for no reason whatsoever (though of course I don't believe he would have ever actually done it), and saying you'd attack someone if they assaulted your pet (again, I fail to believe she actually would but frankly, would anyone blame someone for doing so? I certainly wouldn't).

Well I would have personally said that both comments crossed the line, I don't think it's okay to stab someone if they harmed your pet. :shrug: I also believe neither of them would have done these things, but to me it just screams double standards. I wouldn't have called Conor's rant 'unprovoked' either, it was a build up of anger that he was waiting to release.

My main point is that any 'aggressive' type of language used should result in some sort of warning imo, no matter what the context it was used in. The same applies for Daniel's 'cut her throat' comment about Janice, despite it being a figure of speech as it could be seen as offensive.