That wasn't a drag at all (talk)

Not reaching, just stating something that I read.

If you all think the same that james is the best at everything then great but I was referring to a post that clearly stated that everyone should vote for james to show the haters. So it's obviously going to look from that like it's not because he actually deserves all the awards but it's more about proving a point. I'm not getting dragged into an argument about it, but this is just meant to be a bit of fun for everyone, not just james supporters. He's had his win, I don't see the need in grouping together to vote tactically just to prove some kind of point to everyone else

Seriously? :unsure:

Well to me it's because he deserves it

I voted Austin :flower:

There's 4 posters on that thread. There's 12 votes between the both of them. So 8 came from other people ;)

I'm voting fairly anyway. I've given people like Natasha a vote for awards. I saw Chloe as by far the most fake. And for me Genuine was between Sherrie, Natasha, Austin and James.

A tad messy

That isn't true. But regardless, I never said that all the votes are tactical, of course some people will vote for James or Austin anyway, they are very popular, I simply commented that there is tactical voting (which is undeniable) and now for some reason I'm having to defend the fact that I've pointed it out.

Who you or Jordan or Daniel or anyone else has voted for is irrelevant to the point I was making in the first place which is that group voting is being encouraged in order to get James to win all the awards. Debate the extent to which it will make a difference to the results if you want but it's something that can't be denied, and that's all I was commenting on because if it does make a difference then first of all it ruins what is essentially just meant to be a fun game for everyone to enjoy (not just James fans) but it also makes his wins empty victories. So I don't see the point.

The irony behind all of this being that it's a conversation about the disingenuity of attempting to influence a vote, taking place on a "Most Genuine" thread.

I think you're taking it too seriously

I think its the Jaustin fans that are taking it too seriously considering they're the ones making a campaign :shrug:

When I ran the awards thing, because i did these....(I was going to do this one.) I put the polls on public to see who is voting who.. but i don't think people are being tactical because they obvious want to vote James or who ever.. that thread has around 3-5 members active and one of them voted Austin

James.

Yeah I'm being fair. The maximum amount of members on that thread are 5 who are active (me, Jake, Daniel, Vanessa and rph).

I've been voting on what I think. If I was doing the "I'm voting who I like for the positives/dislike for the negatives" then I wouldn't have voted Chloe as fakest because she wasn't my least favourite. I would have voted Farrah or Sherrie, but they weren't fake, so I didn't vote for them despite me liking them least. (to be fair Chloe is my 3rd least favourite).

No one has made a campaign, me vanny, rph, jordan and salv are the only regulars in that thread

Jake hasn't ever posted in it

Woops, I meant Jordan

No more votes please, Austin is the winner with 22% of the vote

:flutter:

Great award for a great person

Austin, genuine? Rude sure

Most genuine housemate of all time

Genuine to core. Always said what he felt to peoples faces not throwing chairs at someone with their back turned :clap1:

Voted Scoop.