I mean the twist is unfair, but it saved Chloe from eviction and secured her winning over 5 trashy males so I'm glad

I personally think Danielle being evicted without a public vote by two irrelevant housemates who'd only been in for 4 days a year earlier was more unfair than Sam's Cashbomb eviction thingymaflop

How would having both work:laugh: ?

Like, the =/- game or something?

Justice for Virgin queen Dani </3

It's always vote to save for me.

Same for me.

I don't like the negative vibe VTE creates.

I think they were both as bad as each other - the principle is the same. Same with Marlon.

In the final tally a housemates save votes are subtracted from their evict votes.Big Brother Australia have done this successfully before.

Danielle's is the most unfair eviction of all time, especially considering two non entities culled her.

Marlon would've been nominated and out that week had it been a normal eviction with a VTE public vote. Him pressing the button cost him I think. So again, the only difference his none public vote eviction made was him leaving 4 days earlier

This is all speculation though. I think no one should go without a public vote under any circumstances.

They do all the time. This is why someone like Katie Hopkins can get so close to winning.

:flutter:

Good times.

This would be a very interesting system. But I reckon it would be hard to get the scum out. Someone like Marc would get the most evict votes, but he also gets the save votes, which makes his votes neutral.

Katie Hopkins was well-liked, hence why she came so close to winning. That sounds fair enough to me.

Exactly, well liked, even though she was a despicable human being.

But if enough people thought that they wouldn't have voted for her and she would have gone much sooner. The same principle in reverse applies to VTE except VTE boots out the interesting ones.

VTS but both have negatives

No because many people who agreed she was vile would have voted to save her for entertainment.

You're jumping to the conclusion that people vote based on who they "like" or "dislike" as people. It doesn't always work like that.

I hated Jade as a person in BB16 but she was a decent housemate for the TV she made.

80% of people voted to save a man who threatened to shove an epilator up a woman's vagina, whilst also threatening to knock that same woman out over somebody who's only crime was just arguing with that same woman the week she was up.

yeeeeah if you think Marc, Sam, and Simon were the crux of the entertainment in BB16 then that speaks for itself

So you voted for Jade? The thing is with VTS you have to do something positive to stay, whereas with VTE you don't have to do anything.

I've not seen that series so I can't comment.

What does it speak for? It's my personal taste.

No. I wouldn't waste a penny on this sh*te.

Fair enough :joker:

But that doesn't prove your point then.