ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB17 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=683)
-   -   False Rumours about Jeremy (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=297554)

hot2go 09-02-2016 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8503495)
Why do you keep deleting and reposting this message?

Some people regularly ridicule others by poking fun at grammatical errors in their posts, I believe that is wrong. Yesterday someone selectively used cut and paste to edit one of my messages in order to create a fabrication and make me look like a fool.....that may be deemed acceptable to others but it's not to me so I responded to it. Of course, it was important that my retort was not only grammatically correct this time but was presented in a way that couldn't be further used to play silly games.
I merely edited the post several times to avoid any ramifications but clearly that has back fired. I don't think my editing a post to avoid offence should be a bigger problem than someone else editing a post to cause offence but if it created problems for you then I apologise, that was certainly not my intention. I thought my right to amend my own posts were my own business tbh.

Niamh. 09-02-2016 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hot2go (Post 8505050)
Some people regularly ridicule others by poking fun at grammatical errors in their posts, I believe that is wrong. Yesterday someone selectively used cut and paste to edit one of my messages in order to create a fabrication and make me look like a fool.....that may be deemed acceptable to others but it's not to me so I responded to it. Of course, it was important that my retort was not only grammatically correct this time but was presented in a way that couldn't be further used to play silly games.
I merely edited the post several times to avoid any ramifications but clearly that has back fired. I don't think my editing a post to avoid offence should be a bigger problem than someone else editing a post to cause offence but if it created problems for you then I apologise, that was certainly not my intention. I thought my right to amend my own posts were my own business tbh.

No lol I just wondered why you had deleted it so many times is all :laugh: You can report posts if you think they're insulting or breaking the rules though

Also, you don't need to delete a post to Edit it, you just need to press the Edit button on the bottom right of the post

bananarama 10-02-2016 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hot2go (Post 8501882)
Sounds like a typical lovers tiff when one person, who has been cheated on a lot, is told by the gutter press that she has just been cheated on again....I imagine Jeremy had a tough time convincing her but it was very quickly put right and they spent the rest of the day together.
For him to have copped off with some girl in a nightclub in front of the full glare of the entire place, yet not one photo or vid was presented to back up the ridiculous claims is completly not possible. Anyone who was so quick to believe that are idiots, my opinion has not changed. It has been confirmed by the girl who made the claims that it never happened so those who bought into that story were confusing fact with assumptions.
In this country we are all innocent till proven guilty not the other way round.

I agree with your post except for the last sentence about innocent till proven guilty. That claim by governments or what ever is a load of tosh. If one were to be regarded as innocent before proven guilty then no one would be locked up until after a trial.

Innocent people are kept on remand until or unless they can prove they are innocent. Their name is also dragged through the mud regardless of the result because in reality people and the police assume guilt until proven otherwise.

Innocent until proven guilty has always been a load of semantics tosh and always will be.

I am now guilty of feeling better now that's off my chest :laugh:

hot2go 11-02-2016 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bananarama (Post 8508243)
I agree with your post except for the last sentence about innocent till proven guilty. That claim by governments or what ever is a load of tosh. If one were to be regarded as innocent before proven guilty then no one would be locked up until after a trial.

Innocent people are kept on remand until or unless they can prove they are innocent. Their name is also dragged through the mud regardless of the result because in reality people and the police assume guilt until proven otherwise.

Innocent until proven guilty has always been a load of semantics tosh and always will be.

I am now guilty of feeling better now that's off my chest :laugh:

Your bang on correct and the law and the police def only operate in black and white and approach everything in the same generic way....but doesn't mean that we have to be like them though....not when it comes to allegations like those said about Jeremy last week.....it's scary that some people on here believe what is written in the gutter press and then send hate tweets to the guy and about the guy.

Stormy 12-02-2016 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hot2go (Post 8508435)
Your bang on correct and the law and the police def only operate in black and white and approach everything in the same generic way....but doesn't mean that we have to be like them though....not when it comes to allegations like those said about Jeremy last week.....it's scary that some people on here believe what is written in the gutter press and then send hate tweets to the guy and about the guy.

In a court of law it's 'innocent until proven guilty'...in the court of public opinion it's 'guilty until proven innocent'. :hehe:

MrWong 05-03-2016 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hot2go (Post 8501882)
Sounds like a typical lovers tiff when one person, who has been cheated on a lot, is told by the gutter press that she has just been cheated on again....I imagine Jeremy had a tough time convincing her but it was very quickly put right and they spent the rest of the day together.
For him to have copped off with some girl in a nightclub in front of the full glare of the entire place, yet not one photo or vid was presented to back up the ridiculous claims is completly not possible. Anyone who was so quick to believe that are idiots, my opinion has not changed. It has been confirmed by the girl who made the claims that it never happened so those who bought into that story were confusing fact with assumptions.
In this country we are all innocent till proven guilty not the other way round.

The idiots are the ones that believed that he didn't go with that girl. Like I said :smug:

http://shockerfeed.com/exclusive-steph-davis/ - "I went to Newcastle, I ended up with a girl that night"

erinp5 05-03-2016 09:45 AM


VanessaFeltz. 05-03-2016 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by erinp5 (Post 8548696)

How poetic... She cheated on her bf with jeremy and now jeremy has cheated on her couple of days later..


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.