Ain't that the truth

Vote to save isn't exactly fool proof either but at least if there are enough people who appreciate the baddy there's some hope...

Vote to evict protects the beige brigade......and off they trot.....no one liking em, no one disliking em and having never done anything to entertain either camp.

This is why i always prefer CBB. More chance to save your favourite. We were almost got Perez in the final :fist:

Imagine the bad guy in Panto, the kids shout " Get Him Off " in the first scene and off he f-cks....

Call the baby sitter....don't get comfortable love, we're on our way home, shows over

Makes sense, CBB has been better than BB for few years now....it used to be other way round

Can't wait for both CBB series. Vote to save usually get rids of the bores :hee:

Pull it together AUS.

Speaking of Perez another character who was kept in because he was entertaining and him going would ruin the season when really him staying longer than two weeks made the series unwatchable. I supported him at first but soon god so bored of his antics... BB is on everyday there's only so much you can take of thet kind of person before the gimmick gets boring and repetitive.

With a vote to evict he would have been out on the first week. He was very lucky it was vote to save.

That's quite a good analogy actually :joker:

In hindsight I'm not sure if it would of been a better option to let him go. Him and Katie's rivalry in the house stunted the house dynamics and made the show into and everyday screaming match between the two.

Must have been a slow news day.

BB's international impact :clap1:

This is why CBB will always be better than BB. With a vote to save you can even keep the villains if they're entertaining :laugh:

Wasn't so bad in the early years...Cameron, Anthony and Rachel played the part of the support act for two months and got the winners money not having done one remarkable thing the entire time to earn it.....but back then it was just a game show....today they go in there for completely diff reasons.

They're there to get famous and rich and be admired and build careers from it....they should be given the hardest time possible if they wanna earn all that sh-t...they should have to get past a 100 Marcos, Makosis, Marc O'Neills and Rex's....we should be putting people like that in not taking them out.

I agree. I think BB should be vote to save as well, otherwise we will always have snoozefest finals :laugh:

I don't think you're understanding Vanessa I'm criticising that series because Katie and Perez were there for so long.

Why? They both made that series. :laugh:

IT just got boring it was literally a screaming match between the two every single day and we saw non of the others.

But then with vote to evict we would have been left with the bores :joker:

You mention Perez and I immediately think of Katie Hopkins...and immediately remember loads of stuff they did ....I have to pause to recall who the others were and even then I can't think of one thing that Nadia or Patsy or the young girls with their tits out did that was memorable...

People use the word NICE to defend or describe their favourites....I never understand how the word nice plays any important part in what a good housemate should be.

On its own, nice ain't worth sh-t

Exactly. These two were amazing housemates, even if i hated Katie with a passion. :joker:

:clap2: