Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8809298)

So what responses do you want in a news item

because I dont want "my thoughts are with the families of the victims" and bollocks like that?

or "omg RIP"

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 8809340)

This tbh.



Those posts are fine but naturally threads will evolve into full on discussions. That is the point of the forum, yes?

Originally Posted by Tom* (Post 8809347)

As I said in my post...
There's nowt wrong with going in depth with news but a lot of the time it's too stupidly deep and mostly nitpicking and clutching at straws.

Originally Posted by Tom* (Post 8809347)

As I said in my post...
There's nowt wrong with going in depth with news but a lot of the time it's too stupidly deep and mostly nitpicking and clutching at straws.

Originally Posted by Tom* (Post 8809231)

It seems, to me, that it would be logical to seperate Serious Debates and News into a subforum for Serious News and a subforum for Politics & Debates...
I think it'd be more beneficial because I use SD&N mainly for serious new stories - like say, the paris attacks etc. because it's a HUGE story- but it seems like it's being super diluted by random debates about Kactosophobia and, obviously not so random- politics.
So I'd be alright if I put in my preferences that I would rather not see the debates subforum but still be able to see the Serious News forum~ Rather than them being combined.

Would anyone else like them seperated?
(please keep this a civil discussion btw~)