ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   M&S Empire Pie Sparks Fierce Social Media Debate Over ‘Celebrating Colonial Deaths’ (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=310008)

arista 19-09-2016 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8982363)
I wonder what India would be like without our help?

:think:



But this Food Critic
is on about the Killings
the British Empire did

Vicky. 19-09-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8982344)
no Louise is a food critic

Doesn't make her any less of a nutter :p

Niamh. 19-09-2016 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8982354)
neem what are you dipping your nan bread and poppadoms in when you have a curry?


get the riata and mango chutney oot

no I like those onions in the red stuff

Kizzy 19-09-2016 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 8982290)
Mmmmm, looks tasty.
As an old Colonial would it be really bad for me to try one?



Edit. Just realised it had crushed potatoes on top...they can keep it.

What makes you define yourself as a colonial?

Colonials were the IS of the day, not sure how many appreciate this.

jaxie 19-09-2016 02:02 PM

Well playing devils advocate and all that, there are countries who would have been significantly better off if they'd stayed with the British Empire and the French and Dutch come to that! Some countries have been civil war torn since or ruled by home grown dictators far crueler than we would have been in this day and age. I like to think we've grown up some and have our big girl pants on now.

Our past does help to shape us and we can learn from it. There are things we can be proud of and things we should be ashamed of.

That pie looks tasty. I think it is PC correctness gone mad to imply anything about the name. The word Empire has been used in enough fantasies that it does't have to mean anything specific.

jaxie 19-09-2016 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8982465)
What makes you define yourself as a colonial?

Colonials were the IS of the day, not sure how many appreciate this.

:umm2:

Niamh. 19-09-2016 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 8982513)
:umm2:

well the definition of Colonialism is : the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.

so it's not exactly a "nice" thing to be a part of, colonialism is responsible for a whole world of deaths and devastation to my country for example someone saying they're proud of that is a bit nasty, don't you think?

user104658 19-09-2016 02:44 PM

I do like the argument that certain countries would be better off if they'd just stuck with the Empire and gone with it...

A large majority of the poorest countries in the world are post-colonial. Would they be better if if they were still colonies? Maybe, marginally, but the obvious truth is that the BEST scenario for those countries, would be if we had never sailed up to their doorsteps in the first place.

The colonies stripped various countries of their resources, their lifestyle, their cultural identity and their ability to sustain themselves. Then the empire ended and they were simply left in that state. Colonialism created a global imbalance that is not only far from over, the knock-on effect is still massive.

Niamh. 19-09-2016 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 8982536)
I do like the argument that certain countries would be better off if they'd just stuck with the Empire and gone with it...

A large majority of the poorest countries in the world are post-colonial. Would they be better if if they were still colonies? Maybe, marginally, but the obvious truth is that the BEST scenario for those countries, would be if we had never sailed up to their doorsteps in the first place.

The colonies stripped various countries of their resources, their lifestyle, their cultural identity and their ability to sustain themselves. Then the empire ended and they were simply left in that state. Colonialism created a global imbalance that is not only far from over, the knock-on effect is still massive.

Exactly. That argument makes me so angry I can't even reply to it but you've said it all in a much calmer way than I would have/could have :laugh:

jaxie 19-09-2016 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8982516)
well the definition of Colonialism is : the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.

so it's not exactly a "nice" thing to be a part of, colonialism is responsible for a whole world of deaths and devastation to my country for example someone saying they're proud of that is a bit nasty, don't you think?

:nono: I never said I was proud of it.

However I do see a difference in historic colonialism and Islamic state in today's climate.

jaxie 19-09-2016 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8982539)
Exactly. That argument makes me so angry I can't even reply to it but you've said it all in a much calmer way than I would have/could have :laugh:

I did mention I was playing devil's advocate.

"Someone who pretends in an argument or discussion to be against an idea that a lot of people support."

jaxie 19-09-2016 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 8982536)
I do like the argument that certain countries would be better off if they'd just stuck with the Empire and gone with it...

A large majority of the poorest countries in the world are post-colonial. Would they be better if if they were still colonies? Maybe, marginally, but the obvious truth is that the BEST scenario for those countries, would be if we had never sailed up to their doorsteps in the first place.

The colonies stripped various countries of their resources, their lifestyle, their cultural identity and their ability to sustain themselves. Then the empire ended and they were simply left in that state. Colonialism created a global imbalance that is not only far from over, the knock-on effect is still massive.

Ah if only we could time travel and get to grips with the gritty past TS.

I blame the Romans.

Kyle 19-09-2016 02:58 PM

All aboard the offended train

Choo choo

smudgie 19-09-2016 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8982465)
What makes you define yourself as a colonial?

Colonials were the IS of the day, not sure how many appreciate this.

Having lived under Colonial rule, a bunch of us meeting up in a forum many many years later with the help of Facebook etc had our own little group under the banner The old Colonials.

Northern Monkey 19-09-2016 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 8982536)
I do like the argument that certain countries would be better off if they'd just stuck with the Empire and gone with it...

A large majority of the poorest countries in the world are post-colonial. Would they be better if if they were still colonies? Maybe, marginally, but the obvious truth is that the BEST scenario for those countries, would be if we had never sailed up to their doorsteps in the first place.

The colonies stripped various countries of their resources, their lifestyle, their cultural identity and their ability to sustain themselves. Then the empire ended and they were simply left in that state. Colonialism created a global imbalance that is not only far from over, the knock-on effect is still massive.

But don't forget the positives.Think of all that heroin and cardamom we'd have missed out on without the empire.Plus the Indians wouldn't have discovered the pleasures of gin and tonic or maybe we wouldn't have or both.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.