ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   America :It Is now Simple : If you are a Legal Citizen you have no problems (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=315858)

arista 30-01-2017 09:07 AM
"Constitution"


yes its the Law of the Land
NYC no good crying on camera fells.



3 month ban for 7 nation's with terrorist connection
list from former president Barrack

arista 30-01-2017 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 9188527)
Britain should follow Donald Trump's lead and introduce 'extreme vetting,' Nigel Farage says as he defends US President's immigration crackdown
  • Ex-Ukip leader and friend of Trump defends controversial executive order to prevent anyone entering US from seven Muslim majority countries
  • Says President is entitled to introduce measures in bid to crackdown on jihadis
  • Blames ban on Angela Merkel's open-door policy towards refugees fleeing Syria

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...5694293744.jpg

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ation-ban.html

:clap2:

Yes he understands the Law of the Land
Tip Top

Northern Monkey 30-01-2017 03:38 PM
If it was just illegals and suspected extremists then nobody could complain.If it was just vetting people from the countries identified as having extremists then nobody could complain.However that doesn't seem to be what's happening here from the looks of it.

DemolitionRed 30-01-2017 08:50 PM
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/...Jk8?li=AAggFp5

Jihadist groups on Sunday celebrated the Trump administration’s ban on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries, saying the new policy validates their claim that the United States is at war with Islam.
Comments posted to pro-Islamic State social media accounts predicted that President Trump’s executive order would persuade American Muslims to side with the extremists. One posting hailed the U.S. president as “the best caller to Islam,” while others predicted that Trump would soon launch a new war in the Middle East.

The unintended consequences of bad decisions.

user104658 30-01-2017 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 9188527)
Britain should follow Donald Trump's lead and introduce 'extreme vetting,' Nigel Farage says as he defends US President's immigration crackdown
  • Ex-Ukip leader and friend of Trump defends controversial executive order to prevent anyone entering US from seven Muslim majority countries
  • Says President is entitled to introduce measures in bid to crackdown on jihadis
  • Blames ban on Angela Merkel's open-door policy towards refugees fleeing Syria

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...5694293744.jpg

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ation-ban.html

:clap2:
Oh Nigel.

I see your truuue colours shining through...
I see your truuue colours and that's why ur raaacist
so don't be afraid...
to let them show...
truuuue colours,
truuuuuue colours,
Trumps made it acceptableeeee...
to be a xenophoowww(be).


Quite blatantly his multi-decade drive for Brexit had absolutely nothing to do with trade laws et al. and everything to do with him wanting the borders closed to any "other" who might dare to darken the doors of his quaint whitey-white English football hooligan pubs.

DemolitionRed 30-01-2017 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arista (Post 9190950)
Yes he understands the Law of the Land
Tip Top
He's just an opportunist media ***** and a rank hypocrite who does feck all for his money.

Brillopad 30-01-2017 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9190925)
A lot of people behind Trump on here have said "We don't have an issue with immigrants, it just the people who don't follow the rules we have an issue with!".

If that were at all true then why aren't you pissed off that a specific religion is being targeted? or angry that legal permanent residents of that country are being detained in violation of their Constitution and pissed off that legal permanent residents of that country are being threatened with deportation even though they have broken no laws?

I never thought I'd be standing on the same side as my right wing colleagues over a political matter. People who are galaxies apart from each other in political ideology that are all on the same side of this issue... if you find yourself on the other side of that issue....You haven't being paying attention or Something is seriously fcuking wrong.
Why is it it so hard for some to comprehend that women in particular have every reason to have issues with religions that treat women like ****e? What has that got to do with race - it has far more to do with culture and mindsets. If they don't give respect why should they get it back? All the over-the-top hysterics and double standards is truly tedious.

DemolitionRed 31-01-2017 08:46 AM
Acting Attorney General Orders Justice Dept. Not to Defend Refugee Ban update... Trump fires Yates

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...cid=spartanntp

WASHINGTON — Acting Attorney General Sally Q. Yates, a holdover from the Obama administration, ordered the Justice Department on Monday not to defend President Trump’s executive order on immigration in court

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/30/u...memo.html?_r=0

DemolitionRed 31-01-2017 08:51 AM
Trump has not banned all Muslims.He has picked specific Countries out of the largely Muslim World and ignored several Countries where Trump entities have established business relationships. Therefore if the jihadists wish to recruit, the ban is extremely easy to bypass.

Don't take my word for it:


http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Jih...uitment-480001

Northern Monkey 31-01-2017 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9193344)
Trump has not banned all Muslims.He has picked specific Countries out of the largely Muslim World and ignored several Countries where Trump entities have established business relationships. Therefore if the jihadists wish to recruit, the ban is extremely easy to bypass.

Don't take my word for it:


http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Jih...uitment-480001
Those countries weren't actually targeted by Trump.It was actually Obama that flagged those countries as being a terror risk.
I do think Trump has gone too far though.I'm all for vetting people from risk countries but the ban has just caused chaos and if people have a green card then by definition they've already been vetted.

user104658 31-01-2017 10:09 AM
It has absolutely jack **** to do with terrorism. I'm not going to pretend to be "in the know" about the actual reasoning and nor do I think it's just "cos dey all r racists", there's clearly much more to it than that, but what I *do* know is that it will have absolutely zero impact on the risk of a major terrorist incident. It's like performing brain surgery with a ****ing sledgehammer. The plotting, scheming and organisation that goes into a major incident is not going to be interrupted by "closing the borders and airports". Not even slightly.

DemolitionRed 31-01-2017 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 9193393)
Those countries weren't actually targeted by Trump.It was actually Obama that flagged those countries as being a terror risk.
I do think Trump has gone too far though.I'm all for vetting people from risk countries but the ban has just caused chaos and if people have a green card then by definition they've already been vetted.
Yes it was and the question is, why wasn't SA on that list?

Like you, I'm all for vetting but this sort of restriction is going to have a huge impact on the workforce that come in and out of America on business visas.

And to send refugees back is to sign their death warrant.

DemolitionRed 31-01-2017 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 9193433)
It has absolutely jack **** to do with terrorism. I'm not going to pretend to be "in the know" about the actual reasoning and nor do I think it's just "cos dey all r racists", there's clearly much more to it than that, but what I *do* know is that it will have absolutely zero impact on the risk of a major terrorist incident. It's like performing brain surgery with a ****ing sledgehammer. The plotting, scheming and organisation that goes into a major incident is not going to be interrupted by "closing the borders and airports". Not even slightly.
Hehe... I'm keeping that quote.

Northern Monkey 31-01-2017 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9193443)
Yes it was and the question is, why wasn't SA on that list?

Like you, I'm all for vetting but this sort of restriction is going to have a huge impact on the workforce that come in and out of America on business visas.

And to send refugees back is to sign their death warrant.
Yeah Trump should stick to cracking down on illegal immigration.The US should be taking refugees from the refugee camps who can be vetted first just like Britain.That be a positive move that more people could get behind.His supporters and detractors could agree on that.

DemolitionRed 31-01-2017 02:06 PM
Letter from 100-Plus National Security Leaders on Refugee Executive Order

https://lobelog.com/letter-from-100-...ecutive-order/

NicolaMcSlay 02-02-2017 01:41 AM
I agree you need to come usa LEGALLY, i don't get the issue with this. People want this, if they didn't they wouldn't of voted for him as president. We want America safe and not be flooding our borders with immigrants taking our jobs.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.