![]() |
Quote:
:facepalm: please stop |
Quote:
And so to it would be easy for the department to trace this woman via, health, tax, welfare, council records, schools, they just choose not to, or rather they are tasked with so many decisions to be made per day they don't have the time to aid her. She is just 1 of 100 decisions made a day... https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ay-home-office |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Far from accessing paper trails, data or records she was sent to a detention centre... :/ How? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ears-in-the-uk |
Quote:
if you want a discussion about the new guy "threatened" with removal, then please say so after you have finished with what we were previously discussing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and I never once claimed admin ERROR! Or that the lady was dumb! |
Quote:
I don't believe that there is any incompetence, in actuality they are doing their job perfectly, I'm certain that this action is their brief. |
Quote:
And finally why are either of these people undesirable in you opinion |
Quote:
I'm not asking you to agree with me but that's how I see this issue with these cases of people from commonwealth countries who entered as kids and can't prove they were here prior to the 70s having little or no paperwork as evidence. I don't see why it's so much of a stretch when you've heard of people sitting work capability assessments, being found fit for work and dying the same week! I've specified who the undesirables are earlier in the thread candy, keep up. |
Quote:
|
It's quite ridiculous considering that her family brought her to the UK as a result of an immigration drive. To send someone back to a country they do not know is cruel and nonsensical when they've lived in and contributed to the UK for fifty years.
It reminds me of the struggle the Dreamers in the US are going through, to go after people who were essentially raised in a country and for all intents and purpose ARE British/American is a malicious way of trying to achieve targets. |
Quote:
|
Anomalies do happen in a country of millions of people. The question surely is whether its a common event, and I would expect the answer to be no. Therefore, the immigration department should do the right thing and grant this person legal right to stay. It's an exceptional circumstance and should be treated as such. It really doesn't even warrant a news story to be honest.
On the subject of whether she was remise in completing her documentation, there are a hundred potential reasons for it, all valid, and to suggest she is to blame is yet another form of victim blaming. |
Quote:
and this pair don't seem to fall into what your opinion of being an undesirable is, so hence I asked the question Teresa |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I were emigrating to Australia for instance I would make sure I had dotted every i and crossed every t to ensure no one could kick me out. |
Quote:
One needs to remember the status 50 years ago, which I actually do. People were welcomed with open arms, got jobs, did great work, contributed to our economy. To then move the goalposts on what and what is not correct in terms of documentation 40+ years later is beyond the majority of peoples comprehension. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.