What an awful thing to have happen.

https://news.sky.com/story/woman-who...named-11316111

Reports YouTube payed her for her posting
as she got many views.
But then STOPPED giving her money
could be what made her go Crazy.
Her Funding maybe kept her alive?

She Shot herself Dead
in the building.
After failing to solve her problems


[Nasim Aghdam has been named as the shooter who targeted the firm's complex in San Bruno, California, on Tuesday.

Th 39-year-old, who had accused YouTube of discrimination and blocking her work, was later found dead inside the building after apparently turning a handgun on herself.]

https://e3.365dm.com/18/04/1096x616/...20180404045630


From GMBHD, just now , the LA Scottish Reporter
also confirmed the Shooter was Very Angry at
You Tube HQ
owned by Google
Censored her postings
She had gone missing, her dad warned Police.

awful news :(

Her channel seems to have been purged, I wonder what kind of videos she made? Shoe0nhead or Blaire White shared a screenshot which seemed to be some kind of vegan video? But anyway, it only had a few hundred views, which isn't enough to make money on Youtube anymore, so clearly not censorship or demonitisation for her ideas.

her makeup is on fleek

Her being angry at the way Animals are treated in Iran
and Turkey and other nations,

From USA Live news
they said her videos had
bigger views than a few hundred , O. W.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/20...2828803302.jpg

Looks like she went down 100,000 views in the space of 9 months, and she was at one point on 300k views at least, if she eventually went down to a few hundred views per vid because of the new YouTube update, then it looks like the reasoning is confirmed.

Edit: she had five channels(!?) the image shows screengrabs from two different channels

Tragic case really, looks like she snapped.

Hundreds of Youtubers find themsleves being ****ed over by Youtube these last few years. No excuse to try to kill four people.

Yeah, YT's censorship/demonetization/other policies, etc right now is increasingly controversial. I'm pro-decentralization, so I don't think that people should be putting all their eggs in one basket if they're seriously dependent on a website for a livelihood... not a good way to keep a business up. And we can't always be dependent on a single website anyway... have known a fair few third parties to up and go out of the blue with people's portfolios on them. :facepalm: Happens more often than people realize.

Still, I don't see how shooting up Google was a stellar idea... I'm kind of waiting to hear the rest of the story, because so far it sounds like someone just flipping out, heading to a store and shooting up the staff there because that person received very bad customer service (i.e. getting screwed on a large purchase)... sure, it could happen on that basis, but seems like there would likely be other factors too.