ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Big Brother: 2000 - 2024 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=178)
-   -   Which 50-54 day series WORKED BETTER. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341378)

reece(: 25-05-2018 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 10006961)
18 felt longer than 54 days, probably because it didn’t feel rushed.
17 had a super-strong first 3 weeks and then the boyfriend stuff happened and then annihilation happened and then everything after just blurred together.

Our Nat's impact

https://i.imgur.com/YnvpkcF.gif

Tony Montana 25-05-2018 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 10006961)
18 felt longer than 54 days, probably because it didn’t feel rushed.
17 had a super-strong first 3 weeks and then the boyfriend stuff happened and then annihilation happened and then everything after just blurred together.

18 also had a Very strong and Fantastic first 3 weeks, Peaking with Fight Night 3. It went quiet after FN3 and once the Second Chance Housemates Entered, The highlights were Dominated by Smellies Showmance. If it wasn’t for Sue and Simone the final weeks would have been a chore to watch.

17 was more Consistent and Entertaining. Not to mention it’s final weeks was better than 18.

Jake. 26-05-2018 12:24 AM

I disagree about the end of 17 being better than 18. 18 felt far more fulfilling and as if the series had come to a natural end.

Eddie. 26-05-2018 12:28 AM

18 had a proper ending unlike 17.

montblanc 26-05-2018 02:38 AM

BB18


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.