Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
(Post 10088499)
There are many reasons that people voted Trump ranging from being core republicans, to completely agreeing with him. However, yes, the reason that ENOUGH people voted for Trump was backlash against a push for too much social change too quickly. People seeing injustices and changes that need to happen but not allowing that change to be gradual; insisting that it must be ALL and NOW.
The push back was inevitable and it's exactly the same push back that allowed Brexit to happen.
|
The only issue I have with that line of thought, it doesn't get to the specifics of why people vote at all. I can see this reasoning from an oppositional POV... my opinion (i.e. my own), that they are now regretted taking for granted the determination of the American voter, that they should've force fed their policies/rhetoric down people's throats slower?... but that doesn't get to the core of why people vote the way they do. It doesn't get in touch with why voters feel the way they feel... it just again, refers back to Identity Politics 101, that people vote in opposition of things not in support of things (just for an example).
The other side of that coin, if we then see it had been more gradual, does that then validate the toxic rhetoric that people are simply racist for not voting
any other way? So does it mean after 2024... if Trump is re-elected for example, does this then serve to reinforce the opposition's rhetoric of the American voter being a sh**stain? How is this healthy for our country? I mean, I get that feeling completely. It is logical to some degree to think this way. I think an individual has a good reason to take that stance if they take it... but isn't it this tendency
by each party itself to pigeon hole the voter(s) into specific identity groups, also a factor, in scaring away voters for example.. voter suppression which we saw in the 2016 elections by low turnout. I would argue American politic is pretty much revolving around that... and it's this that is tearaing apart of our dialogue, keeping a healthy discourse from occurring... it's keeping average folk and their voices from being heard, much less acknowledged, not only in the mainstream media but in the discussions between both parties in Congress... there's a reason why they have such a massively low approval rating.
That's why that reasoning is not strong enough for me. I think that there is a lot more going on than just Trump evil, American voters bad... Democrats good, social justice bestest...
I remember the run up to 2016. Many of us just watched TV in disgust because of the ****ty options we had... yes, that's
their fault for not choosing better candidates and showing up/registering for primary elections... but also both parties rarely go off-script and it's this tendency to stick to that ridiculous script that is alienating a lot of voices I think.... but it's all we've ever known, and our culture is still mid-shift so to speak, so it's hard to say how that script can be changed to be more inclusive... there can only be one disruptor, but
both parties (particularly their base) want to be the disruptor. That's making it very difficult to make sense of the party messages (from the average voter POV) and their vision and way forward for our country... at least Trump, he's quite clear on quite a few things actually.