Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10103750)

She has some strength on her...

He deserved this tbh

Have already seen people on facebook whinging saying the police should have arrested her for assault :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103725)

It means everytime there's a discussion about something like this where women are sexually harassed/assaulted, which is an issue that happens in the most part to women by men, someone has to bring men up to make sure "they can be victims too"!!! also the fact that you said "problem is" came across like not only could this equally happen to men it would be worse if it happened to men because they couldn't even retaliate

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103755)

No Niamh , as I said every situation is different so don't twist things.
I never said it would be worse if a man was assaulted by a woman :nono: , all I said was it would still be crossing the line and still wrong that's all.

I'm a woman myself Niamh and I think both men & women can be disrespectful and sleazy .

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103754)

You say nothing "Why didn't she scream or lash out?" You lash out "She should be done for assault"...........

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10103766)

Almost as if whatever the woman does, she is in the wrong. Fancy that!

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103758)

I'm not twisting anything, you actually said Problem is if it was reversed a guy couldn't retaliate, doesn't that imply that he would be worse off in some way? I just don't understand why men have to be brought up everytime a case about women is brought up

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103800)

I never said he'd be worse off , I just said he couldn't react the same way

You've taken it the wrong way ,it's hard to explain things on here without tone of voice etc .

Men aren't brought up every time, but sometimes people think of other situations.

Even when issues to do with race ,ethnicity people use hypothetical scenarios .

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10103766)

Almost as if whatever the woman does, she is in the wrong. Fancy that!

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103802)

They really are though, now I've said it maybe you will start noticing more too :laugh:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103802)

They really are though, now I've said it maybe you will start noticing more too :laugh:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10103805)

I cant see anyone saying that at all...talk about blowing things out of proportion...

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103809)

You replied fast
I also said religion gets compared too in other scenario's , loads of us do it .

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103816)

And also what I'm saying is more that opinion it's a fact . no need to be defensive Niamh :rolleyes: .

And the man deserves his punishment, as he needs to realise he can't get away with that .

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103817)

Vicky was talking about people on FB if you re read her original post

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103822)

OK?



OK but if we're talking facts, it's also far more likely that a man does this to a woman but whatever

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103621)

I heard about this ages ago
The guy is clearly Pervy ,the way he touched her is wrong and disrespectful . Makes it even worse that he's a dad with a partner :facepalm: .

I think ANYONE who does this is out of order and sleazy , problem is if roles were reversed and she groped him he wouldn't be able to body slam her . The most he'd be allowed to do is wave his finger and tell her off .

I wonder if he thought he'd get away with it as he does it so quickly as he's walking past, it's as if he thinks its tiggy with her :crazy:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10103875)

I get what you’re saying.

If i’d have ever done that when i’ve been groped by women i’d have had the bouncers stomping all over mi head.

Was she too rough?idk.
She wasn’t defending herself as it’d already happened and she’d chased after him.

We can all cheer and say ‘you go girl’ but did she really do the right thing?

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10103903)

I'm glad you see what I'm saying .

Well he's still alive so I guess its classed as reasonable force , and he still harassed her so she's still standing up for herself, it's not like she used a weapon and beat him to a pulp .

I know it's not the same thing but if a theif breaks into your house ,surely you have every right to defend yourself? , but if it turns into a brawl then what

But yeah she was retaliating to what had happened understandably .

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10103936)

The TL had her bum groped in Lisbon when she was 14 by a young Portuguese man and she punched him to the ground ( and I dont doubt her)

we both agreed he probably never did it again

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10103922)

Poor men

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10103976)

Don’t get me wrong.I think he deserved it.If he’d done that to the Mrs i’d have given him a crack.I’d also be arrested for assault....

I also think the cops probably should’ve told her that revenge isn’t the answer in the eyes of the law.She did chase him and assault him.

The real test I suppose is if the same action is taken with other similar incidents.The law could be different there.