Jack_ |
21-08-2018 10:17 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh.
(Post 10163677)
Does it? :umm2:
What's been "better" about the show since it adopted that style?
The show is on life support because of production decisions like that.
|
No, the show is on life support because of poor production in general, with tacky, overbearing editing, shoddy tasks, endless futile twists and an inconsistent format. Again, I have no issue with them doing normal noms (though I do think they're overrated in general), but the consistent rule should be 2 noms and you're up. Head to heads suck - even more so under VTS - and we're left with nominees like this that'll deal a blow to the series.
I'd always take a scenario where producers manipulate to keep big characters around, because at the end of the day all of them being evicted in the first half of the series isn't good for the show either :umm2: but I'd rather they avoided having to do that with a better rule
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayden
(Post 10163681)
We don't even know if it's the rule yet, watch them next week do everyone with 1 nom be up
|
Nah they've got everything else right this series so if they really wanted to keep Hardeep and Natalie then they'd have just reverted back to type, this tells me they really are going back to basics and we'll be stuck with this rule for the rest of the year now
|