Of course not, but the slightest bit of cropping and dramatic framing and you can conjure a story where there isn't one, just to discredit someone you don't like.

From what others have said, this was a picture taken on a phone, not CCTV, so the point is moot anyway. Mine was about people taking photos od opportune moments and removing all context to create something fictional and malicious.

50 Shades Of Stokes coming to the Cinemas 25th October.


Being serious though, Ben Stokes should be careful what he does out in public if he is genuinely innocent as certain things don't look right out in public.

50 Shades Of Stokes coming to the Cinemas 25th October.


Being serious though, Ben Stokes should be careful what he does out in public if he is genuinely innocent as certain things don't look right out in public.

From what others have said... well then it's a matter of opinion, I'd say it was a photograph of CCTV footage.
It could have been done to make money from the image who knows?
But that's beside the point now they've said it was nothing and we'll have to respect that. I obviously hope it was.