ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Black passenger detained & handcuffed by police officer for eating sandwich... (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=362702)

Twosugars 15-11-2019 05:50 PM

I have and the police is full of racists

Crimson Dynamo 15-11-2019 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10712366)
I have and the police is full of racists

sure

Redway 15-11-2019 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10712292)
rules are rules, i am sure its there for a reason and for passenger safety

:clap1:

Unbelievable.

Livia 15-11-2019 09:20 PM

I have to say, he was probably handcuffed because he swore, refused to show ID and made a homophobic comment to the officer.

GiRTh 15-11-2019 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10712495)
I have to say, he was probably handcuffed because he swore, refused to show ID and made a homophobic comment to the officer.

The cop was already holding him when the video starts. Are you trying to say he got himself arrested?

Livia 15-11-2019 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 10712499)
The cop was already holding him when the video starts. Are you trying to say he got himself arrested?

I'm trying to say... yes, the video shows what happened after the cop detailed him. What I saw was someone being quite belligerent and a police officer being quite calm. I've read about the incident. You can't eat or drink on the platforms nor in the trains and according to the NY Times, there are clear signs up. A mountain was made out of a mole hill, and personally, I'd give the cop and the sandwich man 50% of the blame each.

GiRTh 15-11-2019 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10712514)
I'm trying to say... yes, the video shows what happened after the cop detailed him. What I saw was someone being quite belligerent and a police officer being quite calm. I've read about the incident. You can't eat or drink on the platforms nor in the trains and according to the NY Times, there are clear signs up. A mountain was made out of a mole hill, and personally, I'd give the cop and the sandwich man 50% of the blame each.

So you feel if the man was calm he'd have been Ok. Despite the fact he was being physically held for eating a sandwich. This is a familiar argument, I'm just asking is that what you're saying? :thumbs:

Marsh. 15-11-2019 09:38 PM

Everything that's happening in the world and you have an officer of the law requesting backup for a man eating a sandwich.

The world's gone mad.

Livia 15-11-2019 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 10712519)
So you feel if the man was calm he'd have been Ok. Despite the fact he was being physically held for eating a sandwich. This is a familiar argument, I'm just asking is that what you're saying? :thumbs:



He was being physically held only indirectly because he was eating a sandwich. The real reason he was being physically held is that when he was approached, he was told he wasn't allowed to eat or drink on the platform. But he continued, and the officer issued a citation. When this happened he cursed, refused to show ID and made a homophobic comment to the officer. According to the article I've read. Only then does the video start. I didn't hear anyone mention his race on the video except he himself. I just think the whole thing was handled badly by both parties and a huge fuss ensued. That is what I am saying.

GiRTh 15-11-2019 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10712533)
He was being physically held only indirectly because he was eating a sandwich. The real reason he was being physically held is that when he was approached, he was told he wasn't allowed to eat or drink on the platform. But he continued, and the officer issued a citation. When this happened he cursed, refused to show ID and made a homophobic comment to the officer. According to the article I've read. Only then does the video start. I didn't hear anyone mention his race on the video except he himself. I just think the whole thing was handled badly by both parties and a huge fuss ensued. That is what I am saying.

If you're reading the same article as me then it also goes on to say the officer might have gone too far. Which is surely the point, why are we physically holding anyone for eating a sandwich? He gave him a citation for eating. Laughable but true.

Livia 15-11-2019 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 10712548)
If you're reading the same article as me then it also goes on to say the officer might have gone too far. Which is surely the point, why are we physically holding anyone for eating a sandwich? He gave him a citation for eating. Laughable but true.

Yeah, the officer went too far, of course he did. But what about the homophonic comment? They both went too far. It is just my interpretation of course, but I think this had more to do with two men having a pissing contest, but one had a badge and that trumps sandwich.

GiRTh 15-11-2019 10:19 PM

I dont agree the guy went to far. He was angry at being physically held for eating a sandwich, and he's allowed to show such emotion IMO. Why hold him? Whats he gonna do, run away and eat the sandwich down the road? The holding was not reasonable and I can absolutely understand why he was pissed off..

Livia 15-11-2019 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 10712550)
I dont agree the guy went to far. He was angry at being physically held for eating a sandwich, and he's allowed to show such emotion IMO. Why hold him? Whats he gonna do, run away and eat the sandwich down the road? The holding was not reasonable and I can absolutely understand why he was pissed off..

Like I said, he wasn't being held for eating a sandwich. He was issued a citation for eating a sandwich contrary to Public Health rules clearly signed, and after already having been informed of that by the officer.

He was being held because when the officer issued the citation the bloke kicked off.

GiRTh 15-11-2019 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10712557)
Like I said, he wasn't being held for eating a sandwich. He was issued a citation for eating a sandwich contrary to Public Health rules clearly signed, and after already having been informed of that by the officer.

He was being held because when the officer issued the citation the bloke kicked off.

In my book he's allowed to kick off for such a stupid charge. I'm quite surprised that as an officer of the courts you've made no comment on how frivolous cases like this take man hours and waste the courts time.

To me, that is the point - As I hinted to above - The incident is now famous, the guy is likely to sue and might win and the police department chiefs have to apologize. All in all, this action simply wasn't worth it.

Niamh. 15-11-2019 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 10712560)
In my book he's allowed to kick off for such a stupid charge. I'm quite surprised that as an officer of the courts you've made no comment on how frivolous cases like this take man hours and waste the courts time.



To me, that is the point - As I hinted to above - The incident is now famous, the guy is likely to sue and might win and the police department chiefs have to apologize. All in all, this action simply wasn't worth it.

Absolutely, I've been to San Francisco, nice place but alot of crime, I would have thought 4 police officers arresting a guy for eating a sandwich was a massive waste of their precious time, that could most certainly have been spent looking for actual crime and criminals

Niamh. 15-11-2019 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10712522)
Everything that's happening in the world and you have an officer of the law requesting backup for a man eating a sandwich.

The world's gone mad.

PC gone crazy [emoji33]

Niamh. 15-11-2019 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10712563)
PC gone crazy [emoji33]

And by PC I mean pickled cheese

Kizzy 15-11-2019 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10712549)
Yeah, the officer went too far, of course he did. But what about the homophonic comment? They both went too far. It is just my interpretation of course, but I think this had more to do with two men having a pissing contest, but one had a badge and that trumps sandwich.

* homophobic

What a love most about this story is the organised 'eat in' on many platforms afterwards.

Ammi 16-11-2019 06:23 AM

...I think the important context to this though, is why Mr Foster was approached in the first place for eating his breakfast sandwich...?....because everything else came after that ...he stated clearly that he didn’t feel detained, he felt harassed because the video is claiming that eating a breakfast sandwich is not an uncommon occurrence and that the police officer had passed many people also eating, to approach Mr Foster...surely for anyone, that would definitely feel like harassment...the officer didn’t explain why he had been singled out and but because he was being questioned...because he had caused and escalated a situation of a guy eating a breakfast sandwich...something that’s apparently commonplace...?...he called for backup ...I can understand why the apologies, this is policing at its worst, surely...and because of police racial stereotyping ...it’s understandable that it’s being questioned in that way as well...

Ammi 16-11-2019 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 10712574)
* homophobic

What a love most about this story is the organised 'eat in' on many platforms afterwards.

...and they all became club sandwiches...

Beso 16-11-2019 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 10712605)
...and they all became club sandwiches...

Cop should have club sandwiched the mouthy ****.

Ammi 16-11-2019 07:26 AM

...I guess using physical/aggressive force against a breakfast sandwich eater would be a way as well, which would seem quite reasonable...hmmm...

Crimson Dynamo 16-11-2019 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 10712617)
...I guess using physical/aggressive force against a breakfast sandwich eater would be a way as well, which would seem quite reasonable...hmmm...

the man broke the law


the law is there for a reason


do you wish to encourage people to break the law and be antisocial??

Ammi 16-11-2019 08:37 AM

...I would hope that the law would be equal and not be walking passed other sandwiches, to get to a specific one it’s focused on...as claimed in the video...and the eat-in being staged in protest because breakfast sandwich eaters on the platform appear to be a common and regular sight, which is baffling to many...why that particular sandwich offended that particular officer...

Crimson Dynamo 16-11-2019 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 10712644)
...I would hope that the law would be equal and not be walking passed other sandwiches, to get to a specific one it’s focused on...as claimed in the video...and the eat-in being staged in protest because breakfast sandwich eaters on the platform appear to be a common and regular sight, which is baffling to many...why that particular sandwich offended that particular officer...

the video could be doctored, who made the video, what was their motivation to make one and post it when a man clearly broke the law?


this whole incident tells one more about the maker than the perp


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.