ughhh I just gagged reading that https://media1.tenor.com/images/4eed...temid=14249490

:joker:

Gross. Society need rules that prohibit showing your toes in public, just like genitals. Horrid things.

They look excellent at funerals though.

I think the point of the thread has been lost, the point is the usual flesh or nude tone of plasters has not been too diverse. It's seen as a big deal in the beauty community to not extend shade ranges and are looked down on for not being inclusive enough.
I applaud tesco for addressing this issue, yes there are clear plasters and these might be crap that's not the point is it?

The point is now the little boy/girl who has a skin tone plaster can have one in their skin tone, we might not appreciate the meaning of that for many.

I think it is really sweet that they have a more diverse selection of plasters.

I really like the dinosaur ones :flutter:

To go with your scaly skin?

:joker::joker::joker:

yes :flutter:

I think this is a good idea. I had one on the side of my face by my ear for a couple of days because of minor surgery and it definitely would have been better having a plaster which was less obvious :laugh:

In work I wear blue ones, so smurfs are accounted for too. So woke!

Bloody EU regulations probably forced the blue ones on us commie chefs to begin with.

It's not something I've ever really thought about. But if there is such a need within the black community, I wonder why a black business person didn't make them years ago.

Personally I like Barbie plasters, or at a push, Disney Princess.