What WOULD we do without her.

The whole country agrees

As a future king and queen of our country they have no choice but to be assets.

The first lady saying."and his cock looks just like him"

Perks of the job...

Lucky they are genuine assets then - imagine the disaster if Harry had been the first born. :facepalm:

Not so much perks as the job itself.

Then he would have been tied to the crown. Luckily he wasn’t and has had the chance to break away from a tired establishment

Showing again you don't understand the role of the Royal family. Google it .
If that was the job itself Meghan wouldn't have scuttled off, too fragile to cope.
Poor lamb. :hehe:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ton-visit.html

Irish newspapers praise Prince William and Kate Middleton for message of 'peace and reconciliation' during tour - while columnist compares their visit to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'chaotic' trip two years ago.

A report in the Irish Daily Mail from Craig Hughes said a 'message of peace and reconciliation rang out throughout the opening day' of the official visit.

And Irish Times journalist Miriam Lord said William and Kate were launching a 'charm offensive' during their three-day tour, nine years after the Queen's visit.

The political sketch writer added that it appeared the Cambridges 'were well briefed on the political situation in Ireland in a non-partisan way'.

Meanwhile the Independent's editorial said the visit 'should be appreciated, after 800 years of shared history with UK we should take nothing for granted'.

You didn't understand my post at all did you?

No, better to provoke and disparage.

The Daily Mail is agenda-driven.

It was Irish Independent executive editor Caitlin McBride who made the comment about M&H. The Daily Mail reported what she said.

The article contains a lot more than a "comment". My comment pertains to the article.

Why then did you highlight the part mentioning the comment about H&M. Come on. :laugh:

What agenda do you think the DM had in that article? That the Irish newspapers were not praising the Cambridge's visit, it was lies? Or if not, what exactly?

I didn't highlight it. It's highlighted in your original post. :suspect: "Come on"

Agenda? To tear strips off Harry and his family and act as though rainbows and teddy bears fly out of Kate's backside. As with every article on the matter.

Where in that DM quote I posted were they tearing strips off Harry and his family?

I never said they did. You asked me what their agenda was.

The article feeds into the Saint Kate narrative.

Here it is, plain as day.

Yes.... you asked me what their agenda was after I said the Daily Mail is agenda driven. I clarified what their agenda was.

Not sure why that needs repeating.

My reply... without the unnecessary edit. :rolleyes:

fgs I'd imagine people in Ireland aren't that fussed either way about either couple, they both seem nice and friendly etc etc........no one cares beyond that :laugh:

They probably treat it like any polite celeb couple. :laugh:

You must think people are blind and stupid. How can you even see the keyboard for egg. :laugh:

And btw, in answer to a comment you made on the other thread, you are again saying things with no proof or evidence whatsoever, like I regurgitate opinions that I read and have none of my own.
Another throwaway comment with no substance.

I'm not repeating myself again Jet.

It's literally there for rational people to read.

You asked me the DAILY MAIL'S agenda. The article practically crowns Kate a saint. Not sure how basic you need it explaining.