![]() |
Quote:
|
I don't know if I'm being naive, but whilst this is clearly hypocritical of her, I don't see the huge deal?
If she went there with just her family (who she lives with) then surely they are not putting anyone at risk? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Still, I don't think it warrants her losing her job. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Simply as unnecessary travelling can result in accidents and breakdowns which put further unnecessary strains on the services Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
It's a shame that Charles will have to resign from the Royal Family and abdicate the throne to William when the queen dies, as he ****ed off up here to Balmoral after the advice not to go to holiday homes... and dripping with Covid-19.
Oh wait, what? What's that? We don't apply the same rules in that case? :omgno: I am most SHOCKED. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But no one has had more than a passing word to say about that, whereas the CMO going to her holiday house has had her branded a selfish demon and forced to resign. I'm actually not even saying she didn't make a stupid decision or didn't deserve to be chastised for it... I'm just wondering why Charlie gets a pass. Well, I'm not wondering why, really we all know why (he's first-tier royalty, and he's male) ... I'm just irked by it. Imagine it was Meghan Markle :umm2: |
Quote:
Agreed he shouldn't have travelled, but they are completely different scenarios |
Quote:
I agree that the hypocrisy adds another element and it's a very different situation, but I don't think one is necessarily worse than the other. We are CONSTANTLY being told that the Royals are, or are supposed to be, role models for the public and that's part of why it's important that we keep them around at all, and why it's important to keep "undesireables" out of the line up, and yet here we have the future king (maybe, I reckon Liz might outlive him) blatantly disregarding the advice. How can you expect people to see that and not question why they're not allowed to do the same? |
Quote:
Yes there shouldn't be one rule for one |
Inept leadership.
|
Can someone from Scotland tell us how visible she's generally been in regards to telling people to stay in, etc?
|
A wrongdoing, sure, but this definitely DOES NOT warrant her losing her job. This was such a minor bending of the rules that I can't even believe it made the news to begin with. This is another typical witch hunt case where people project fake outrage in order to cause harm/comeuppance to someone else. Now she's been strong-armed into stepping down from a position she'll have worked her entire life for. A huge shame!
The people who were "outraged" will have forgotten about this in 5 minutes and moved on with their lives. Unfortunately, she'll have to face long term consequences as a result of this fleeting anger. |
Quote:
Having to replace the CMO in the middle of this is an absolute disaster to be honest, and is why she wasn't going to be fired, but the press heat has given no choice but resignation. It should have been a grovelling apology now, and resignation when things have started to quieten down. Now they need to appoint a new CMO and that person has to take the time to get up to speed, and will still be lacking a lot of vital experience even when they are up to speed. It's going to slow things down and cause more confusion. Total mess. But people need their pound of flesh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is not a minor offence by the country s leading medical officer ffs |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
They reported that she’d been on stage each day by the side of misery/guts Sturgeon. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
How is it a MINOR bending of the rules ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.